From: Chenyuan Mi <chenyuan_mi@163.com>
To: alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com,
simona@ffwll.ch, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] drm/amdgpu: fix use-after-free in userq signal/wait IOCTLs
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:22:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260309022229.63071-1-chenyuan_mi@163.com> (raw)
Both amdgpu_userq_wait_ioctl() and amdgpu_userq_signal_ioctl()
access user queue objects obtained from xa_load() without holding
userq_mutex. A concurrent AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_FREE can destroy and
kfree the queue in this window, leading to use-after-free.
The two bugs have different origins:
- Patch 1 fixes a wait-path regression introduced by commit
4b27406380b0 ("drm/amdgpu: Add queue id support to the user queue
wait IOCTL"), which removed the indirect fence_drv_xa_ptr model
and its NULL-check safety net from commit ed5fdc1fc282
("drm/amdgpu: Fix the use-after-free issue in wait IOCTL").
- Patch 2 fixes a similar pre-existing lifetime bug in the signal
path, present since commit a292fdecd728 ("drm/amdgpu: Implement
userqueue signal/wait IOCTL").
Patch 1 adds explicit userq_mutex coverage around the xa_load and
subsequent fence_drv_xa operations in the wait path.
Patch 2 moves the ensure_ev_fence call (which acquires
userq_mutex) before xa_load in the signal path, so that the queue
lookup and all subsequent accesses are covered by the same lock.
Chenyuan Mi (2):
drm/amdgpu: protect waitq access with userq_mutex in wait IOCTL
drm/amdgpu: protect queue access in signal IOCTL
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c | 25 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 2:22 Chenyuan Mi [this message]
2026-03-09 2:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: protect waitq access with userq_mutex in wait IOCTL Chenyuan Mi
2026-03-09 10:07 ` Christian König
2026-03-10 2:44 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-09 2:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: protect queue access in signal IOCTL Chenyuan Mi
2026-03-09 10:09 ` Christian König
2026-03-10 2:44 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-10 2:44 ` Claude review: drm/amdgpu: fix use-after-free in userq signal/wait IOCTLs Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260309022229.63071-1-chenyuan_mi@163.com \
--to=chenyuan_mi@163.com \
--cc=Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox