From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>,
mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, jani.nikula@intel.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
matthew.auld@intel.com, arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com,
louis.chauvet@bootlin.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
pmladek@suse.com, ukaszb@chromium.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 01/65] dyndbg: fix NULL ptr on i386 due to section alignment
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:09:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260313131045.2526422-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313131045.2526422-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
When dyndbg classmaps get used (later in this series), the
__dyndbg_classes section (which has 28 byte structs on i386), causes
mis-alignment of the following __dyndbg section, resulting in a NULL
pointer deref in dynamic_debug_init().
To fix this, employ belt + suspenders:
1. move __dyndbg section above __dyndbg_classes. This restores it to
its original position directly after the ALIGN(8), and fixes the
immediate problem.
2. add ALIGN(8) to the BOUNDED_SECTION* macros. This aligns all
existing sections using the macro, and also fixes a future
dyndbg_class_* addition which would suffer the same misalignment on
i386. Many of the existing macro uses already have a preceding ALIGN,
these are now redundant, but are harmless, so are left to avoid churn.
3. remove BOUNDED_SECTION* uses in ORC_UNWINDER sections. These have
smaller alignments, *and* scripts/sorttable.c does not tolerate the
added ALIGN(8) padding.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202601211325.7e1f336-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
---
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
index eeb070f330bd..a2ba7e3d9994 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
@@ -212,11 +212,13 @@
#endif
#define BOUNDED_SECTION_PRE_LABEL(_sec_, _label_, _BEGIN_, _END_) \
+ . = ALIGN(8); \
_BEGIN_##_label_ = .; \
KEEP(*(_sec_)) \
_END_##_label_ = .;
#define BOUNDED_SECTION_POST_LABEL(_sec_, _label_, _BEGIN_, _END_) \
+ . = ALIGN(8); \
_label_##_BEGIN_ = .; \
KEEP(*(_sec_)) \
_label_##_END_ = .;
@@ -383,8 +385,8 @@
*(__tracepoints) \
/* implement dynamic printk debug */ \
. = ALIGN(8); \
- BOUNDED_SECTION_BY(__dyndbg_classes, ___dyndbg_classes) \
BOUNDED_SECTION_BY(__dyndbg, ___dyndbg) \
+ BOUNDED_SECTION_BY(__dyndbg_classes, ___dyndbg_classes) \
CODETAG_SECTIONS() \
LIKELY_PROFILE() \
BRANCH_PROFILE() \
@@ -867,15 +869,21 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC
#define ORC_UNWIND_TABLE \
.orc_header : AT(ADDR(.orc_header) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
- BOUNDED_SECTION_BY(.orc_header, _orc_header) \
+ __start_orc_header = .; \
+ KEEP(*(.orc_header)) \
+ __stop_orc_header = .; \
} \
. = ALIGN(4); \
.orc_unwind_ip : AT(ADDR(.orc_unwind_ip) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
- BOUNDED_SECTION_BY(.orc_unwind_ip, _orc_unwind_ip) \
+ __start_orc_unwind_ip = .; \
+ KEEP(*(.orc_unwind_ip)) \
+ __stop_orc_unwind_ip = .; \
} \
. = ALIGN(2); \
.orc_unwind : AT(ADDR(.orc_unwind) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
- BOUNDED_SECTION_BY(.orc_unwind, _orc_unwind) \
+ __start_orc_unwind = .; \
+ KEEP(*(.orc_unwind)) \
+ __stop_orc_unwind = .; \
} \
text_size = _etext - _stext; \
. = ALIGN(4); \
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 13:09 [PATCH v11 00/65] Fix DRM_USE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y Jim Cromie
2026-03-13 13:09 ` Jim Cromie [this message]
2026-03-13 21:02 ` Claude review: dyndbg: fix NULL ptr on i386 due to section alignment Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-13 13:09 ` [PATCH v11 02/65] dyndbg: factor ddebug_match_desc out from ddebug_change Jim Cromie
2026-03-13 21:02 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-13 21:02 ` Claude review: Fix DRM_USE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y Claude Code Review Bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-13 13:19 [PATCH v11 00/65] " Jim Cromie
2026-03-13 13:19 ` [PATCH v11 01/65] dyndbg: fix NULL ptr on i386 due to section alignment Jim Cromie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260313131045.2526422-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--to=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louis.chauvet@bootlin.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ukaszb@chromium.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox