From: Alessio Belle <alessio.belle@imgtec.com>
To: Frank Binns <frank.binns@imgtec.com>,
Matt Coster <matt.coster@imgtec.com>,
Brajesh Gupta <brajesh.gupta@imgtec.com>,
"Alexandru Dadu" <alexandru.dadu@imgtec.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
"Alessio Belle" <alessio.belle@imgtec.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] drm/imagination: Skip check on paired job fence during job submission
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:56:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260330-job-submission-fixes-cleanup-v1-3-7de8c09cef8c@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330-job-submission-fixes-cleanup-v1-0-7de8c09cef8c@imgtec.com>
While submitting a paired fragment job, there is no need to manually
look for, and skip, the paired job fence, as the existing logic to
resolve dependencies to pvr_queue_fence objects will have failed to
resolve it already and continued with the next one.
Point this out where the fence is actually accessed and drop the related
check.
Signed-off-by: Alessio Belle <alessio.belle@imgtec.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c
index f1e54e6d940d..527eae1309d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c
@@ -646,10 +646,6 @@ static void pvr_queue_submit_job_to_cccb(struct pvr_job *job)
if (!jfence)
continue;
- /* This fence will be placed last, as partial render fence. */
- if (is_paired_job_fence(fence, job))
- continue;
-
if (dma_fence_is_signaled(&jfence->base))
continue;
@@ -664,8 +660,13 @@ static void pvr_queue_submit_job_to_cccb(struct pvr_job *job)
}
}
- /* Partial render fence goes last. */
if (job->type == DRM_PVR_JOB_TYPE_FRAGMENT && job->paired_job) {
+ /*
+ * The loop above will only process dependencies backed by a UFO i.e. with
+ * a valid parent fence assigned, but the paired job dependency won't have
+ * one until both jobs have been submitted. Access the parent fence directly
+ * here instead, submitting it last as partial render fence.
+ */
jfence = to_pvr_queue_job_fence(job->paired_job->done_fence);
if (!WARN_ON(!jfence)) {
pvr_fw_object_get_fw_addr(jfence->queue->timeline_ufo.fw_obj,
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 7:56 [PATCH 0/8] drm/imagination: Job submission fixes and cleanup Alessio Belle
2026-03-30 7:56 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/imagination: Count paired job fence as dependency in prepare_job() Alessio Belle
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 7:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/imagination: Fit paired fragment job in the correct CCCB Alessio Belle
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 7:56 ` Alessio Belle [this message]
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: drm/imagination: Skip check on paired job fence during job submission Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 7:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/imagination: Rename pvr_queue_fence_is_ufo_backed() to reflect usage Alessio Belle
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 7:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/imagination: Rename fence returned by pvr_queue_job_arm() Alessio Belle
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 7:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/imagination: Move repeated job fence check to its own function Alessio Belle
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 7:56 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/imagination: Update check to skip prepare_job() for fragment jobs Alessio Belle
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 7:56 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/imagination: Minor improvements to job submission code documentation Alessio Belle
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31 7:33 ` Claude review: drm/imagination: Job submission fixes and cleanup Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260330-job-submission-fixes-cleanup-v1-3-7de8c09cef8c@imgtec.com \
--to=alessio.belle@imgtec.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.dadu@imgtec.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=brajesh.gupta@imgtec.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frank.binns@imgtec.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matt.coster@imgtec.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox