From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>,
"Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"Deak, Imre" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] drm/i915/display: Add drm helper to check pr optimization support
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 06:40:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c5fab038a854604d8009bd94c27106933f750ed.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260312050035.3493690-2-animesh.manna@intel.com>
On Thu, 2026-03-12 at 10:30 +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> Add api to check panel replay optimization supported or not to
> drm-core DP tunneling framework which can be used by other driver
> as well.
>
> Suggested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.c | 17
> +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.h | 6 ++++++
> include/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.h | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.c
> index f442430d8de7..39c07cb4123b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct drm_dp_tunnel {
> bool bw_alloc_enabled:1;
> bool has_io_error:1;
> bool destroyed:1;
> + bool pr_optimization_support:1;
> };
>
> struct drm_dp_tunnel_group_state;
> @@ -508,6 +509,8 @@ create_tunnel(struct drm_dp_tunnel_mgr *mgr,
>
> tunnel->bw_alloc_supported =
> tunnel_reg_bw_alloc_supported(regs);
> tunnel->bw_alloc_enabled =
> tunnel_reg_bw_alloc_enabled(regs);
> + tunnel->pr_optimization_support = tunnel_reg(regs,
> DP_TUNNELING_CAPABILITIES) &
> +
> DP_PANEL_REPLAY_OPTIMIZATION_SUPPORT;
>
> if (!add_tunnel_to_group(mgr, drv_group_id, tunnel)) {
> kfree(tunnel);
> @@ -1036,6 +1039,20 @@ bool drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(const
> struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled);
>
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported - Query the PR BW
> optimization support
> + * @tunnel: Tunnel object
> + *
> + * Query if the PR BW optimization is supported for @tunnel.
> + *
> + * Returns %true if the PR BW optimiation is supported for @tunnel.
> + */
> +bool drm_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(const struct
> drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel)
> +{
> + return tunnel && tunnel->pr_optimization_support;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported);
> +
> static int clear_bw_req_state(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> {
> u8 bw_req_mask = DP_BW_REQUEST_SUCCEEDED |
> DP_BW_REQUEST_FAILED;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> index 1fd1ac8d556d..075aea9d6ede 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> @@ -296,6 +296,20 @@ bool intel_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(intel_dp->tunnel);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * intel_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported - Query the PR BW
> optimization support
> + * @intel_dp: DP port object
> + *
> + * Query whether a DP tunnel is connected on @intel_dp and the
> tunnel supports
> + * the PR BW optimization.
How this is checking if DP tunnel is connected? To me it looks like it
is just checking if PR BW optimization is supported.
> + *
> + * Returns %true if the BW allocation mode is supported on
> @intel_dp.
> + */
> +bool intel_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> +{
> + return drm_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(intel_dp-
> >tunnel);
> +}
I would guess it is not ok to mix Intel specific and generic drm
changes into one patch.
Maybe you could add:
if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 35)
return false;
into here? Otherwise you need to modify check in patch 3 as:
if (intel_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(intel_dp) &&
(DISPLAY_VER(display) < 35 ||
!intel_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(intel_dp)))
BR,
Jouni Högander
> +
> /**
> * intel_dp_tunnel_suspend - Suspend a DP tunnel connected on a port
> * @intel_dp: DP port object
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.h
> index 7f0f720e8dca..03e147736b65 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ void intel_dp_tunnel_resume(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> void intel_dp_tunnel_suspend(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>
> bool intel_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +bool intel_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp);
>
> void
> intel_dp_tunnel_atomic_cleanup_inherited_state(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state);
> @@ -76,6 +77,11 @@ static inline bool
> intel_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline bool intel_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> intel_dp_tunnel_atomic_cleanup_inherited_state(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state) {}
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.h
> b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.h
> index 87212c847915..4aa3ce9fd829 100644
> --- a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.h
> +++ b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ int drm_dp_tunnel_destroy(struct drm_dp_tunnel
> *tunnel);
> int drm_dp_tunnel_enable_bw_alloc(struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel);
> int drm_dp_tunnel_disable_bw_alloc(struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel);
> bool drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(const struct drm_dp_tunnel
> *tunnel);
> +bool drm_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(const struct
> drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel);
> int drm_dp_tunnel_alloc_bw(struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel, int bw);
> int drm_dp_tunnel_get_allocated_bw(struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel);
> int drm_dp_tunnel_update_state(struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel);
> @@ -140,6 +141,11 @@ static inline bool
> drm_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(const struct drm_dp_tunnel
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline bool drm_dp_tunnel_pr_optimization_supported(const
> struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline int
> drm_dp_tunnel_alloc_bw(struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel, int bw)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 5:00 [PATCH v7 0/3] Panel Replay BW optimization Animesh Manna
2026-03-12 5:00 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] drm/i915/display: Add drm helper to check pr optimization support Animesh Manna
2026-03-12 6:40 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2026-03-12 8:36 ` Manna, Animesh
2026-03-13 4:30 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-12 5:00 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915/display: Panel Replay BW optimization for DP2.0 tunneling Animesh Manna
2026-03-12 6:44 ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-03-12 8:44 ` Manna, Animesh
2026-03-13 4:30 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-12 5:00 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] drm/i915/display: Disable Panel Replay for DP-tunneling without optimization Animesh Manna
2026-03-12 6:17 ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-03-12 8:33 ` Manna, Animesh
2026-03-13 4:30 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-12 8:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Panel Replay BW optimization Hogander, Jouni
2026-03-12 8:41 ` Manna, Animesh
2026-03-12 15:18 ` Imre Deak
2026-03-13 4:30 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c5fab038a854604d8009bd94c27106933f750ed.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox