public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Dongwon Kim <dongwon.kim@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 04/26] dma-buf: Route SGT related actions through attach->map_type
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 20:11:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4-v1-b5cab63049c0+191af-dmabuf_map_type_jgg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0-v1-b5cab63049c0+191af-dmabuf_map_type_jgg@nvidia.com>

Now that dma_buf_mapping_attach() ensures a mapping_type exists, even for
exporters and importers that don't provide it, route operations through the
map_type.

For map/unmap this will go through dma_buf_sgt_compat_map_dma_buf() which
calls the same attach->dmabuf->ops->map_dma_buf().

Move the debugfs processing unique to SGT into a callback too.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 6e89fcfdad3015..4211ae2b462bdd 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -1149,12 +1149,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_unpin, "DMA_BUF");
 struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
 					enum dma_data_direction direction)
 {
+	const struct dma_buf_mapping_sgt_exp_ops *sgt_exp_ops =
+		dma_buf_get_sgt_ops(attach);
 	struct sg_table *sg_table;
 	signed long ret;
 
 	might_sleep();
 
-	if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf))
+	if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sgt_exp_ops))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
 	dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
@@ -1170,7 +1172,7 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
 			return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
-	sg_table = attach->dmabuf->ops->map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
+	sg_table = sgt_exp_ops->map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
 	if (!sg_table)
 		sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	if (IS_ERR(sg_table))
@@ -1208,7 +1210,7 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
 	return sg_table;
 
 error_unmap:
-	attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
+	sgt_exp_ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
 	sg_table = ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 error_unpin:
@@ -1261,15 +1263,18 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
 				struct sg_table *sg_table,
 				enum dma_data_direction direction)
 {
+	const struct dma_buf_mapping_sgt_exp_ops *sgt_exp_ops =
+		dma_buf_get_sgt_ops(attach);
+
 	might_sleep();
 
-	if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table))
+	if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table || !sgt_exp_ops))
 		return;
 
 	dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
 
 	mangle_sg_table(sg_table);
-	attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
+	sgt_exp_ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
 
 	if (dma_buf_pin_on_map(attach))
 		attach->dmabuf->ops->unpin(attach);
@@ -1700,7 +1705,11 @@ static int dma_buf_debug_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
 		attach_count = 0;
 
 		list_for_each_entry(attach_obj, &buf_obj->attachments, node) {
-			seq_printf(s, "\t%s\n", dev_name(attach_obj->dev));
+			seq_printf(s, "\t%s:", attach_obj->map_type.type->name);
+			if (attach_obj->map_type.type->debugfs_dump)
+				attach_obj->map_type.type->debugfs_dump(
+					s, attach_obj);
+			seq_putc(s, '\n');
 			attach_count++;
 		}
 		dma_resv_unlock(buf_obj->resv);
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-18  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-18  0:11 [PATCH RFC 00/26] Add DMA-buf mapping types and convert vfio/iommufd to use them Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 01/26] dma-buf: Introduce DMA-buf mapping types Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 02/26] dma-buf: Add the SGT DMA mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 03/26] dma-buf: Add dma_buf_mapping_attach() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: dma-buf: Route SGT related actions through attach->map_type Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 05/26] dma-buf: Allow single exporter drivers to avoid the match_mapping function Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 06/26] drm: Check the SGT ops for drm_gem_map_dma_buf() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 07/26] dma-buf: Convert all the simple exporters to use SGT mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 08/26] drm/vmwgfx: Use match_mapping instead of dummy calls Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 09/26] accel/habanalabs: Use the SGT mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 10/26] drm/xe/dma-buf: " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 11/26] drm/amdgpu: " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 12/26] vfio/pci: Change the DMA-buf exporter to use mapping_type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 13/26] dma-buf: Update dma_buf_phys_vec_to_sgt() to use the SGT mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 14/26] iio: buffer: convert " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 15/26] functionfs: " Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 16/26] dma-buf: Remove unused SGT stuff from the common structures Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:37   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 17/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_map_attachment(_unlocked) to dma_buf_sgt_ Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 18/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_unmap_attachment(_unlocked) to dma_buf_sgt_* Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 19/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_attach() to dma_buf_sgt_attach() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 20/26] treewide: Rename dma_buf_dynamic_attach() to dma_buf_sgt_dynamic_attach() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 21/26] dma-buf: Add the Physical Address List DMA mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 22/26] vfio/pci: Add physical address list support to DMABUF Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 23/26] iommufd: Use the PAL mapping type instead of a vfio function Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 24/26] iommufd: Support DMA-bufs with multiple physical ranges Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 25/26] iommufd/selftest: Check multi-phys DMA-buf scenarios Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  0:11 ` [PATCH RFC 26/26] dma-buf: Add kunit tests for mapping type Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-18  1:38   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-18  1:37 ` Claude review: Add DMA-buf mapping types and convert vfio/iommufd to use them Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4-v1-b5cab63049c0+191af-dmabuf_map_type_jgg@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dongwon.kim@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox