From: syzbot <syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: ryasuoka@redhat.com
Cc: airlied@redhat.com, dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, gurchetansingh@chromium.org,
kraxel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
olvaffe@gmail.com, ryasuoka@redhat.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
tzimmermann@suse.de, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/virtio: abort virtqueue wait on device removal to avoid hung task
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 19:19:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a0e6bc5.a00a0220.396cf0.0001.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521-virtio-gpu_wait_event-v2-1-5796b3a71d03@redhat.com>
> virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs() and virtio_gpu_queue_cursor() use
> wait_event() without any abort condition when waiting for virtqueue
> space. If the host device stops processing commands, these waits block
> indefinitely inside a drm_dev_enter/exit() critical section. Since
> drm_dev_unplug(), which is called in device removal and system shutdown
> call path, blocks on synchronize_srcu() until all critical sections
> complete, device removal and system shutdown also hang.
>
> Add a vqs_released flag to virtio_gpu_device and include it in the
> wait_event() condition. Set the flag and wake up both queues in a new
> virtio_gpu_release_vqs() helper, called before drm_dev_unplug() in both
> virtio_gpu_remove() and virtio_gpu_shutdown(). When the flag is set, the
> wait returns immediately and the command is aborted, following the same
> cleanup path as drm_dev_enter() failure.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+d6dd6f86d3aaf7eebe7406e45c1c6e549453f224@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d6dd6f86d3aaf7eebe7406e45c1c6e549453f224
> Reported-by: syzbot+908bd910da5dd79b88de4cf7baf376cc873a922e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=908bd910da5dd79b88de4cf7baf376cc873a922e
> Signed-off-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Update the commit message.
> - Replace wait_event_timeout() with wait_event() using a compound
> condition that includes a new vqs_released flag.
> - Add virtio_gpu_release_vqs() helper to set the flag and wake up
> both queues, called before drm_dev_unplug() in remove and shutdown
> paths.
> - Remove the hardcoded 5-second timeout. Recovery is now driven by
> the driver flag instead of an arbitrary timeout value.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> index a5ce96fb8a1d..e4fe5e0780f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> @@ -119,10 +119,24 @@ static int virtio_gpu_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Release pending virtqueue waits so the drm_dev_enter/exit() critical
> + * sections complete before drm_dev_unplug() blocks on synchronize_srcu().
> + */
> +static void virtio_gpu_release_vqs(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = dev->dev_private;
> +
> + vgdev->vqs_released = true;
> + wake_up_all(&vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue);
> + wake_up_all(&vgdev->cursorq.ack_queue);
> +}
> +
> static void virtio_gpu_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = vdev->priv;
>
> + virtio_gpu_release_vqs(dev);
> drm_dev_unplug(dev);
> drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev);
> virtio_gpu_deinit(dev);
> @@ -133,6 +147,7 @@ static void virtio_gpu_shutdown(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = vdev->priv;
>
> + virtio_gpu_release_vqs(dev);
> /* stop talking to the device */
> drm_dev_unplug(dev);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> index f17660a71a3e..0bd69a40857e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ struct virtio_gpu_device {
>
> struct virtio_gpu_queue ctrlq;
> struct virtio_gpu_queue cursorq;
> + bool vqs_released;
> struct kmem_cache *vbufs;
>
> atomic_t pending_commands;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> index 67865810a2e7..8057a9b7356d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,19 @@ static int virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
> if (vq->num_free < elemcnt) {
> spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
> virtio_gpu_notify(vgdev);
> - wait_event(vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue, vq->num_free >= elemcnt);
> + wait_event(vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue,
> + vq->num_free >= elemcnt || vgdev->vqs_released);
> + /*
> + * Set by virtio_gpu_release_vqs() to unblock
> + * synchronize_srcu() wait in drm_dev_unplug().
> + */
> + if (vgdev->vqs_released) {
> + if (fence && vbuf->objs)
> + virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(vbuf->objs);
> + free_vbuf(vgdev, vbuf);
> + drm_dev_exit(idx);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> goto again;
> }
>
> @@ -566,7 +578,14 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
> ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, outcnt, 0, vbuf, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
> spin_unlock(&vgdev->cursorq.qlock);
> - wait_event(vgdev->cursorq.ack_queue, vq->num_free >= outcnt);
> + wait_event(vgdev->cursorq.ack_queue,
> + vq->num_free >= outcnt || vgdev->vqs_released);
> + /* See comment in virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs(). */
> + if (vgdev->vqs_released) {
> + free_vbuf(vgdev, vbuf);
> + drm_dev_exit(idx);
> + return;
> + }
> spin_lock(&vgdev->cursorq.qlock);
> goto retry;
> } else {
>
> ---
> base-commit: 5200f5f493f79f14bbdc349e402a40dfb32f23c8
> change-id: 20260518-virtio-gpu_wait_event-5aa060754f12
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@redhat.com>
>
I see the command but can't find the corresponding bug.
The email is sent to syzbot+HASH@syzkaller.appspotmail.com address
but the HASH does not correspond to any known bug.
Please double check the address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 2:19 [PATCH v2] drm/virtio: abort virtqueue wait on device removal to avoid hung task Ryosuke Yasuoka
2026-05-21 2:19 ` syzbot
2026-05-21 2:19 ` syzbot [this message]
2026-05-21 19:01 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2026-05-21 19:02 ` syzbot
2026-05-21 19:02 ` syzbot
2026-05-22 8:51 ` Ryosuke Yasuoka
2026-05-22 8:51 ` syzbot
2026-05-22 8:51 ` syzbot
2026-05-25 11:05 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-25 11:05 ` Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a0e6bc5.a00a0220.396cf0.0001.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gurchetansingh@chromium.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=ryasuoka@redhat.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox