From: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Akash Goel <akash.goel@arm.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <rob.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/gem: Make the GEM LRU lock part of drm_device
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 10:13:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPaKu7Q7RuwgGg3EvO3SLKr8__VmmKrhhUMTV=WBKjSB8c_qTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512-panthor-shrinker-fixes-v3-1-3bf066259471@collabora.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 11:59 PM Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Recently, a few races have been discovered in the GEM LRU logic, all
> of them caused by the fact the LRU lock is accessed through
> gem->lru->lock, and that very same lock also protects changes to
> gem->lru, leading to situations where gem->lru needs to first be
> accessed without the lock held, to then get the lru to access the lock
> through and finally take the lock and do the expected operation.
>
> Currently, the only driver making use of this API (MSM) declares a
> device-wide lock, and the user we're about to add (panthor) will
> do the same. There's no evidence that we will ever have a driver
> that wants different pools of LRUs protected by different locks under
> the same drm_device. So we're better off moving this lock to drm_device
> and always locking it through obj->dev->gem_lru_mutex, or directly
> through dev->gem_lru_mutex.
>
> If anyone ever needs more fine-grained locking, this can be revisited
> to pass some drm_gem_lru_pool object representing the pool of LRUs
> under a specific lock, but for now, the per-device lock seems to be
> enough.
>
> Fixes: e7c2af13f811 ("drm/gem: Add LRU/shrinker helper")
> Reported-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/work_items/86
> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <rob.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
I cannot quite reproduce with or without the fix, but this is
Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
> ---
> As reported by Chia-I [1], a race exists between drm_gem_lru_remove()
> and drm_gem_lru_scan(), causing a UAF on a stack-allocated object.
>
> This new version only keeps the last patch of the series that
> addresses the problem more generically by moving the LRU lock to the
> drm_device object.
>
> [1]https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/work_items/86
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Only keep patch 4 and flag it for backport
> - Rebase on drm-misc-fixes
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260508-panthor-shrinker-fixes-v2-0-39cdb7d577c9@collabora.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Collect R-b
> - Drop a useless obj->lru != NULL check in drm_gem_lru_scan()
> - Fix another race introduced in patch 2
> - Document why the lru != NULL check done without the lru lock held
> in drm_gem_lru_remove() is safe
> - Add a patch to sanitize the GEM LRU locking: lock is now part of
> drm_device, meaning we don't have this chicken/egg problem where
> the lock that needs to acquired is under gem->lru->lock, and
> gem->lru is also supposed to be accessed with the lru->lock held
> - Fix typos in commit messages and comments
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260506-panthor-shrinker-fixes-v1-0-e7721526de96@collabora.com
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 34 +++++++++++++++-------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 11 +++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 7 -------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c | 6 +++---
> include/drm/drm_device.h | 7 +++++++
> include/drm/drm_gem.h | 20 +++++++++-----------
> 11 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> index 985c283cf59f..675675480da4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> @@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ static void drm_dev_init_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
> mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex);
> mutex_destroy(&dev->clientlist_mutex);
> mutex_destroy(&dev->filelist_mutex);
> + mutex_destroy(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> }
>
> static int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> @@ -738,6 +739,7 @@ static int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vblank_event_list);
>
> spin_lock_init(&dev->event_lock);
> + mutex_init(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> mutex_init(&dev->filelist_mutex);
> mutex_init(&dev->clientlist_mutex);
> mutex_init(&dev->master_mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index d6424267260b..2b1ac2b02b14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -1544,9 +1544,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_unlock_reservations);
> * @lock: The lock protecting the LRU
> */
> void
> -drm_gem_lru_init(struct drm_gem_lru *lru, struct mutex *lock)
> +drm_gem_lru_init(struct drm_gem_lru *lru)
> {
> - lru->lock = lock;
> lru->count = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lru->list);
> }
> @@ -1571,14 +1570,10 @@ drm_gem_lru_remove_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> void
> drm_gem_lru_remove(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - struct drm_gem_lru *lru = obj->lru;
> -
> - if (!lru)
> - return;
> -
> - mutex_lock(lru->lock);
> - drm_gem_lru_remove_locked(obj);
> - mutex_unlock(lru->lock);
> + mutex_lock(&obj->dev->gem_lru_mutex);
This becomes a cost that all drivers pay. I guess it is not too big an issue.
> + if (obj->lru)
> + drm_gem_lru_remove_locked(obj);
> + mutex_unlock(&obj->dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_lru_remove);
>
> @@ -1593,7 +1588,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_lru_remove);
> void
> drm_gem_lru_move_tail_locked(struct drm_gem_lru *lru, struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_held_once(lru->lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held_once(&obj->dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> if (obj->lru)
> drm_gem_lru_remove_locked(obj);
> @@ -1617,9 +1612,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_lru_move_tail_locked);
> void
> drm_gem_lru_move_tail(struct drm_gem_lru *lru, struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - mutex_lock(lru->lock);
> + mutex_lock(&obj->dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> drm_gem_lru_move_tail_locked(lru, obj);
> - mutex_unlock(lru->lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&obj->dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_lru_move_tail);
>
> @@ -1640,7 +1635,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_lru_move_tail);
> * @ticket: Optional ww_acquire_ctx context to use for locking
> */
> unsigned long
> -drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
> +drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
> unsigned int nr_to_scan,
> unsigned long *remaining,
> bool (*shrink)(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket),
> @@ -1650,9 +1646,9 @@ drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
> struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> unsigned freed = 0;
>
> - drm_gem_lru_init(&still_in_lru, lru->lock);
> + drm_gem_lru_init(&still_in_lru);
>
> - mutex_lock(lru->lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> while (freed < nr_to_scan) {
> obj = list_first_entry_or_null(&lru->list, typeof(*obj), lru_node);
> @@ -1675,7 +1671,7 @@ drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
> * rest of the loop body, to reduce contention with other
> * code paths that need the LRU lock
> */
> - mutex_unlock(lru->lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> if (ticket)
> ww_acquire_init(ticket, &reservation_ww_class);
> @@ -1709,7 +1705,7 @@ drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
>
> tail:
> drm_gem_object_put(obj);
> - mutex_lock(lru->lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1721,7 +1717,7 @@ drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
> list_splice_tail(&still_in_lru.list, &lru->list);
> lru->count += still_in_lru.count;
>
> - mutex_unlock(lru->lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> return freed;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 195f40e331e5..cc2bcd14b1c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -128,11 +128,10 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv,
> /*
> * Initialize the LRUs:
> */
> - mutex_init(&priv->lru.lock);
> - drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.unbacked, &priv->lru.lock);
> - drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.pinned, &priv->lru.lock);
> - drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.willneed, &priv->lru.lock);
> - drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.dontneed, &priv->lru.lock);
> + drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.unbacked);
> + drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.pinned);
> + drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.willneed);
> + drm_gem_lru_init(&priv->lru.dontneed);
>
> /* Initialize stall-on-fault */
> spin_lock_init(&priv->fault_stall_lock);
> @@ -140,7 +139,7 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv,
>
> /* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */
> fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
> - might_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + might_lock(&ddev->gem_lru_mutex);
> fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
>
> if (priv->kms_init) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> index 6d847d593f1a..617b3c4b42c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> @@ -150,13 +150,6 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
> * DONTNEED state (ie. can be purged)
> */
> struct drm_gem_lru dontneed;
> -
> - /**
> - * lock:
> - *
> - * Protects manipulation of all of the LRUs.
> - */
> - struct mutex lock;
> } lru;
>
> struct notifier_block vmap_notifier;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index 2cb3ab04f125..070f5fc4bc17 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> @@ -177,11 +177,11 @@ static void update_lru_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>
> static void update_lru(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> update_lru_locked(obj);
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> }
>
> static struct page **get_pages(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> @@ -292,11 +292,11 @@ void msm_gem_pin_obj_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>
> static void pin_obj_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> msm_gem_pin_obj_locked(obj);
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> }
>
> struct page **msm_gem_pin_pages_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> @@ -487,16 +487,16 @@ int msm_gem_pin_vma_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct drm_gpuva *vma)
>
> void msm_gem_unpin_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
> struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = to_msm_bo(obj);
>
> msm_gem_assert_locked(obj);
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> msm_obj->pin_count--;
> GEM_WARN_ON(msm_obj->pin_count < 0);
> update_lru_locked(obj);
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> }
>
> /* Special unpin path for use in fence-signaling path, avoiding the need
> @@ -507,10 +507,10 @@ void msm_gem_unpin_locked(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> */
> void msm_gem_unpin_active(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> {
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
> struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = to_msm_bo(obj);
>
> - GEM_WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&priv->lru.lock));
> + GEM_WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->gem_lru_mutex));
>
> msm_obj->pin_count--;
> GEM_WARN_ON(msm_obj->pin_count < 0);
> @@ -797,12 +797,12 @@ void msm_gem_put_vaddr(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> */
> int msm_gem_madvise(struct drm_gem_object *obj, unsigned madv)
> {
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
> struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = to_msm_bo(obj);
>
> msm_gem_lock(obj);
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> if (msm_obj->madv != __MSM_MADV_PURGED)
> msm_obj->madv = madv;
> @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ int msm_gem_madvise(struct drm_gem_object *obj, unsigned madv)
> */
> update_lru_locked(obj);
>
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> msm_gem_unlock(obj);
>
> @@ -839,10 +839,10 @@ void msm_gem_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>
> put_pages(obj);
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> /* A one-way transition: */
> msm_obj->madv = __MSM_MADV_PURGED;
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> drm_gem_free_mmap_offset(obj);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
> index 31fa51a44f86..c07af9602fee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
> if (!stages[i].cond)
> continue;
> stages[i].freed =
> - drm_gem_lru_scan(stages[i].lru, nr,
> + drm_gem_lru_scan(priv->dev, stages[i].lru, nr,
> &stages[i].remaining,
> stages[i].shrink,
> &ticket);
> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_vmap(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> unsigned long remaining = 0;
>
> for (idx = 0; lrus[idx] && unmapped < vmap_shrink_limit; idx++) {
> - unmapped += drm_gem_lru_scan(lrus[idx],
> + unmapped += drm_gem_lru_scan(priv->dev, lrus[idx],
> vmap_shrink_limit - unmapped,
> &remaining,
> vmap_shrink,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> index 26ea8a28be47..3c6bc90c3d48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int submit_fence_sync(struct msm_gem_submit *submit)
>
> static int submit_pin_objects(struct msm_gem_submit *submit)
> {
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = submit->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = submit->dev;
> int i, ret = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < submit->nr_bos; i++) {
> @@ -381,11 +381,11 @@ static int submit_pin_objects(struct msm_gem_submit *submit)
> * get_pages() which could trigger reclaim.. and if we held the LRU lock
> * could trigger deadlock with the shrinker).
> */
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> for (i = 0; i < submit->nr_bos; i++) {
> msm_gem_pin_obj_locked(submit->bos[i].obj);
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> submit->bos_pinned = true;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> index 1a952b171ed7..c4cfe036066b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_vma.c
> @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *
> msm_vma_job_run(struct drm_sched_job *_job)
> {
> struct msm_vm_bind_job *job = to_msm_vm_bind_job(_job);
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = job->vm->drm->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = job->vm->drm;
> struct msm_gem_vm *vm = to_msm_vm(job->vm);
> struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> int ret = vm->unusable ? -EINVAL : 0;
> @@ -745,13 +745,13 @@ msm_vma_job_run(struct drm_sched_job *_job)
> if (ret)
> msm_gem_vm_unusable(job->vm);
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> job_foreach_bo (obj, job) {
> msm_gem_unpin_active(obj);
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> /* VM_BIND ops are synchronous, so no fence to wait on: */
> return NULL;
> @@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ vm_bind_job_pin_objects(struct msm_vm_bind_job *job)
> return PTR_ERR(pages);
> }
>
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = job->vm->drm->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = job->vm->drm;
>
> /*
> * A second loop while holding the LRU lock (a) avoids acquiring/dropping
> @@ -1314,10 +1314,10 @@ vm_bind_job_pin_objects(struct msm_vm_bind_job *job)
> * get_pages() which could trigger reclaim.. and if we held the LRU lock
> * could trigger deadlock with the shrinker).
> */
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
> job_foreach_bo (obj, job)
> msm_gem_pin_obj_locked(obj);
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> job->bos_pinned = true;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
> index 30ddb5351e98..2d6b930b766e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ static struct dma_fence *msm_job_run(struct drm_sched_job *job)
> struct msm_gem_submit *submit = to_msm_submit(job);
> struct msm_fence_context *fctx = submit->ring->fctx;
> struct msm_gpu *gpu = submit->gpu;
> - struct msm_drm_private *priv = gpu->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = gpu->dev;
> unsigned nr_cmds = submit->nr_cmds;
> int i;
>
> msm_fence_init(submit->hw_fence, fctx);
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> for (i = 0; i < submit->nr_bos; i++) {
> struct drm_gem_object *obj = submit->bos[i].obj;
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *msm_job_run(struct drm_sched_job *job)
>
> submit->bos_pinned = false;
>
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lru.lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->gem_lru_mutex);
>
> /* TODO move submit path over to using a per-ring lock.. */
> mutex_lock(&gpu->lock);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> index bc78fb77cc27..768a8dae83c5 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> @@ -375,6 +375,13 @@ struct drm_device {
> * Root directory for debugfs files.
> */
> struct dentry *debugfs_root;
> +
> + /**
> + * @gem_lru_mutex:
> + *
> + * Lock protecting movement of GEM objects between LRUs.
> + */
> + struct mutex gem_lru_mutex;
> };
>
> void drm_dev_set_dma_dev(struct drm_device *dev, struct device *dma_dev);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gem.h b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> index 86f5846154f7..8a704f6a65c1 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
> @@ -245,17 +245,11 @@ struct drm_gem_object_funcs {
> * for lockless &shrinker.count_objects, and provides
> * &drm_gem_lru_scan for driver's &shrinker.scan_objects
> * implementation.
> + *
> + * Any access to this kind of object must be done with
> + * drm_device::gem_lru_mutex held.
> */
> struct drm_gem_lru {
> - /**
> - * @lock:
> - *
> - * Lock protecting movement of GEM objects between LRUs. All
> - * LRUs that the object can move between should be protected
> - * by the same lock.
> - */
> - struct mutex *lock;
> -
> /**
> * @count:
> *
> @@ -453,6 +447,9 @@ struct drm_gem_object {
> * @lru:
> *
> * The current LRU list that the GEM object is on.
> + *
> + * Access to this field must be done with drm_device::gem_lru_mutex
> + * held.
> */
> struct drm_gem_lru *lru;
> };
> @@ -610,12 +607,13 @@ void drm_gem_unlock_reservations(struct drm_gem_object **objs, int count,
> int drm_gem_dumb_map_offset(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *dev,
> u32 handle, u64 *offset);
>
> -void drm_gem_lru_init(struct drm_gem_lru *lru, struct mutex *lock);
> +void drm_gem_lru_init(struct drm_gem_lru *lru);
> void drm_gem_lru_remove(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
> void drm_gem_lru_move_tail_locked(struct drm_gem_lru *lru, struct drm_gem_object *obj);
> void drm_gem_lru_move_tail(struct drm_gem_lru *lru, struct drm_gem_object *obj);
> unsigned long
> -drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
> +drm_gem_lru_scan(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_gem_lru *lru,
> unsigned int nr_to_scan,
> unsigned long *remaining,
> bool (*shrink)(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket),
>
> ---
> base-commit: b2ed01e7ad3de80333e9b962a44024b094bc0b2b
> change-id: 20260506-panthor-shrinker-fixes-58c1f45cfc41
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 6:59 [PATCH v3] drm/gem: Make the GEM LRU lock part of drm_device Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 17:13 ` Chia-I Wu [this message]
2026-05-14 0:55 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-14 3:56 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-14 15:44 ` Steven Price
2026-05-16 4:06 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-16 4:06 ` Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPaKu7Q7RuwgGg3EvO3SLKr8__VmmKrhhUMTV=WBKjSB8c_qTA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akash.goel@arm.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=rob.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox