From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AC31094489 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC1B10E26F; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com header.b="uKdagoi2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-106104.protonmail.ch (mail-106104.protonmail.ch [79.135.106.104]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA8FB10E04A for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:15:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1774109734; x=1774368934; bh=QotTHgm5szfDydHr9RZe/Pmi7UIj/OMAipB3hOHJLmw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=uKdagoi2L9q735o9uBLUbe0p9IWsDjPM59Lh+XCNGXygsYF1FJY8D/cM343QnBvMP 2S1IgoGYX/UPdcZcJEdRwT7HspcHAZxGg5vRP9jC164LzPwyWuo7LdSE3UIXUhXZmW /AbSqNvQ1+5dx+VQqZNRTO5WqTFiNK7AR7/alVFwjTf3nnRTkCk8XBo8A7NfBJUtXs byKWK8K1DgTke2SI08LPhdsCEww7qja7UknjAMgGkIfiA6MgXBDnvvRua6Li5WvcIb nnxORmWAPuJLUoCX43jSELPFsbkuC0fSDr8+nyJLI7IpH1Tfrol47qppo4mA6XmHMF zzK2OxKFWJYQQ== Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:15:29 +0000 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski From: cristian_ci Cc: Neil Armstrong , Jessica Zhang , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Novatek NT35532 LCD DSI Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9bb6e4ac-c7f2-4f1d-aff0-70eefec810a2@kernel.org> References: <20260318-rimob-new-features-v2-0-c1bf8917449e@protonmail.com> <20260318-rimob-new-features-v2-1-c1bf8917449e@protonmail.com> <20260319-amorphous-pastoral-turtle-851af9@quoll> <9bb6e4ac-c7f2-4f1d-aff0-70eefec810a2@kernel.org> Feedback-ID: 27475468:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: c3476e88b1fb925ce3150479b96fa7d10da5ebb6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Saturday, March 21st, 2026 at 10:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 20/03/2026 23:32, cristian_ci wrote: > > On Thursday, March 19th, 2026 at 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 11:28:09PM +0100, Cristian Cozzolino wrote: > >>> + avdd-supply: > >>> + description: positive boost supply regulator > >>> + > >>> + avee-supply: > >>> + description: negative boost supply regulator > >>> + > >>> + vci-supply: > >>> + description: regulator that supplies the analog voltage > >>> + > >>> + vddam-supply: > >>> + description: power supply for MIPI interface > >>> + > >>> + vddi-supply: > >>> + description: regulator that supplies the I/O voltage > >>> + > >>> + port: true > >>> + > >>> +required: > >>> + - compatible > >>> + - reg > >>> + - reset-gpios > >>> + - avdd-supply > >>> + - avee-supply > >>> + - vci-supply > >> > >> Only VDDI is required according to datasheet (see page 11 and page 16)= . > > > > Just to be sure, are you mentioning the part saying there are multiple > > power modes (2-1PWR, 2-2PWR, 3=C3=A9WR and 4PWR) related to NT35532? > > > >> Others are needed only in specific configurations, which I would ignor= e > >> for the simplicity of the binding. Drop these three. > >> > >> Previous discussion point was about this - write bindings based on > >> datasheet, since it is available. > > > > I've removed avdd, avee and vci supplies from 'required' properties > > and I've also tested the new bindings (just for completeness). Now, > > I'm going to reintroduce again the issue already raised previously > > (for which I received no replies in v1): should I submit a v3 > > series including my new changes or I've to stick with v2 here, in > > order to address review concerns about binding, first? > > >=20 > I don't understand the question. This is v2, right? So I asked to make > changes to it, thus you should submit v3 after receiving some more > review for example. I've submitted v3 of patch series considering that, apart dt-bindings, I=20 think I've addressed reviews for the rest of patches, during these last=20 days. > Best regards, > Krzysztof >