From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Arun Pravin <arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/tests: Mark slow tests as slow
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:29:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bafed0bf-4cb0-4ad2-b027-8d826dc781d4@ursulin.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DGN5YXMO9CBB.5T29K0XHUXMF@kernel.org>
On 24/02/2026 11:43, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> (Cc: Tvrtko)
>
> On Tue Feb 24, 2026 at 12:03 PM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Some DRM tests cross the 1s execution time threshold that defines a test
>> as slow. Let's flag them as such.
>
> <snip>
>
>> static struct kunit_case drm_sched_credits_tests[] = {
>> - KUNIT_CASE(drm_sched_test_credits),
>> + KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(drm_sched_test_credits),
>
> Hm..I don't think this test should be that slow.
>
> Looking at the code, I see intentional timeouts through:
>
> done = drm_mock_sched_job_wait_scheduled(job[1], HZ);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, done);
>
> Since the timeout is in jiffies, this should be always 1s, which seems a bit
> overkill.
>
> Maybe we should just change this to msecs_to_jiffies(200), which should still be
> plenty and keep the test below 500ms.
Right, 200ms should be more than plenty. It is only making sure the
scheduler is not oversubscribing the configured credits, and the delay
needed to be sure about that is around two worker wake up to run cycles.
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 11:03 [PATCH] drm/tests: Mark slow tests as slow Maxime Ripard
2026-02-24 11:12 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-02-24 11:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-24 12:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2026-02-24 12:44 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-02-24 12:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-02-26 10:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2026-02-26 12:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-02-26 12:48 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-02-26 13:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-02-26 13:17 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-02-26 13:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-02-24 13:07 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-02-27 5:13 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-27 5:13 ` Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bafed0bf-4cb0-4ad2-b027-8d826dc781d4@ursulin.net \
--to=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox