Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] drm/ttm: Split cgroup charge and resource allocation

[Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>]

On 02/03/2026 12:37, Natalie Vock wrote:
> Coupling resource allocation and cgroup charging is racy when charging
> succeeds, but subsequent resource allocation fails. Certain eviction
> decisions are made on the basis of whether the allocating cgroup is
> protected, i.e. within its min/low limits, but with the charge being
> tied to resource allocation (and uncharged when the resource allocation
> fails), this check is done at a point where the allocation is not actually
> charged to the cgroup.
> 
> This is subtly wrong if the allocation were to cause the cgroup to exceed
> the min/low protection, but it's even more wrong if the same cgroup tries
> allocating multiple buffers concurrently: In this case, the min/low
> protection may pass for all allocation attempts when the real min/low
> protection covers only some, or potentially none of the allocated
> buffers.
> 
> Instead, charge the allocation to the cgroup once and keep the charge
> for as long as we try to allocate a ttm_resource, and only undo the charge
> if allocating the resource is ultimately unsuccessful and we move on to
> a different ttm_place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Natalie Vock <natalie.vock@gmx.de>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c       | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h     |  6 ++++-
>   3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 3e62cab51f870..53c4de4bcc1e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -490,6 +490,8 @@ int ttm_bo_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_resource_manager *man
>   }
>   
>   struct ttm_bo_alloc_state {
> +	/** @charge_pool: The memory pool the resource is charged to */
> +	struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state *charge_pool;
>   	/** @limit_pool: Which pool limit we should test against */
>   	struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state *limit_pool;
>   };
> @@ -544,9 +546,17 @@ static s64 ttm_bo_evict_cb(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *
>   		goto out;
>   
>   	evict_walk->evicted++;
> +	if (!evict_walk->alloc_state->charge_pool) {
> +		lret = ttm_resource_try_charge(bo, evict_walk->place,
> +					       &evict_walk->alloc_state->charge_pool, NULL);

Right, this is if charging against the 1st attempted placement failed. 
It is a bit sub-optimal that the two placec doing the charge is split 
like this.

Would it work to use ttm_bo_alloc_at_place() here as well?

Regards,

Tvrtko

> +		if (lret == -EAGAIN)
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		else if (lret)
> +			return lret;
> +	}
>   	if (evict_walk->res)
>   		lret = ttm_resource_alloc(evict_walk->evictor, evict_walk->place,
> -					  evict_walk->res, NULL);
> +					  evict_walk->res, evict_walk->alloc_state->charge_pool);
>   	if (lret == 0)
>   		return 1;
>   out:
> @@ -724,10 +734,8 @@ static int ttm_bo_alloc_at_place(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	may_evict = (force_space && place->mem_type != TTM_PL_SYSTEM);
> -
> -	ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, res,
> -				 force_space ? &alloc_state->limit_pool : NULL);
> -
> +	ret = ttm_resource_try_charge(bo, place, &alloc_state->charge_pool,
> +				      force_space ? &alloc_state->limit_pool : NULL);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		/*
>   		 * -EAGAIN means the charge failed, which we treat like an
> @@ -737,14 +745,22 @@ static int ttm_bo_alloc_at_place(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>   		 * attempt.
>   		 */
>   		if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> -			return may_evict ? -EBUSY : -ENOSPC;
> +			ret = may_evict ? -EBUSY : -ENOSPC;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>   
> +	ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, res, alloc_state->charge_pool);
> +	if (ret) {
>   		if (ret == -ENOSPC && may_evict)
> -			return -EBUSY;
> -
> +			ret = -EBUSY;
>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Ownership of charge_pool has been transferred to the TTM resource,
> +	 * don't make the caller think we still hold a reference to it.
> +	 */
> +	alloc_state->charge_pool = NULL;
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -799,6 +815,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_alloc_resource(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>   				res, &alloc_state);
>   
>   		if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
> +			dmem_cgroup_uncharge(alloc_state.charge_pool, bo->base.size);
>   			dmem_cgroup_pool_state_put(alloc_state.limit_pool);
>   			continue;
>   		} else if (ret == -EBUSY) {
> @@ -807,11 +824,15 @@ static int ttm_bo_alloc_resource(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>   
>   			dmem_cgroup_pool_state_put(alloc_state.limit_pool);
>   
> -			if (ret == -EBUSY)
> -				continue;
> -			else if (ret)
> -				return;
> +			if (ret) {
> +				dmem_cgroup_uncharge(alloc_state.charge_pool,
> +						bo->base.size);
> +				if (ret == -EBUSY)
> +					continue;
> +				return ret;
> +			}
>   		} else if (ret) {
> +			dmem_cgroup_uncharge(alloc_state.charge_pool, bo->base.size);
>   			dmem_cgroup_pool_state_put(alloc_state.limit_pool);
>   			return ret;
>   		}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> index 192fca24f37e4..a8a836f6e376a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> @@ -373,30 +373,52 @@ void ttm_resource_fini(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_fini);
>   
> +/**
> + * ttm_resource_try_charge - charge a resource manager's cgroup pool
> + * @bo: buffer for which an allocation should be charged
> + * @place: where the allocation is attempted to be placed
> + * @ret_pool: on charge success, the pool that was charged
> + * @ret_limit_pool: on charge failure, the pool responsible for the failure
> + *
> + * Should be used to charge cgroups before attempting resource allocation.
> + * When charging succeeds, the value of ret_pool should be passed to
> + * ttm_resource_alloc.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 on charge success, negative errno on failure.
> + */
> +int ttm_resource_try_charge(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> +			    const struct ttm_place *place,
> +			    struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state **ret_pool,
> +			    struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state **ret_limit_pool)
> +{
> +	struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
> +		ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, place->mem_type);
> +
> +	if (!man->cg) {
> +		*ret_pool = NULL;
> +		if (ret_limit_pool)
> +			*ret_limit_pool = NULL;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return dmem_cgroup_try_charge(man->cg, bo->base.size, ret_pool,
> +				      ret_limit_pool);
> +}
> +
>   int ttm_resource_alloc(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>   		       const struct ttm_place *place,
>   		       struct ttm_resource **res_ptr,
> -		       struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state **ret_limit_pool)
> +		       struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state *charge_pool)
>   {
>   	struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
>   		ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, place->mem_type);
> -	struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state *pool = NULL;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	if (man->cg) {
> -		ret = dmem_cgroup_try_charge(man->cg, bo->base.size, &pool, ret_limit_pool);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> -
>   	ret = man->func->alloc(man, bo, place, res_ptr);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		if (pool)
> -			dmem_cgroup_uncharge(pool, bo->base.size);
> +	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
> -	}
>   
> -	(*res_ptr)->css = pool;
> +	(*res_ptr)->css = charge_pool;
>   
>   	spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
>   	ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(*res_ptr, bo);
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
> index 33e80f30b8b82..549b5b796884d 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
> @@ -456,10 +456,14 @@ void ttm_resource_init(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>   void ttm_resource_fini(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
>   		       struct ttm_resource *res);
>   
> +int ttm_resource_try_charge(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> +			    const struct ttm_place *place,
> +			    struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state **ret_pool,
> +			    struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state **ret_limit_pool);
>   int ttm_resource_alloc(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>   		       const struct ttm_place *place,
>   		       struct ttm_resource **res,
> -		       struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state **ret_limit_pool);
> +		       struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state *charge_pool);
>   void ttm_resource_free(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_resource **res);
>   bool ttm_resource_intersects(struct ttm_device *bdev,
>   			     struct ttm_resource *res,
>