From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm: verisilicon: convert drm_format to vs_format in atomic_check
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 16:24:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-overall-20260210141300.749013-1-zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260210141300.749013-1-zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>
Overall Series Review
Subject: drm: verisilicon: convert drm_format to
vs_format in atomic_check
Author: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>
Patches: 4
Reviewed: 2026-02-11T16:24:25.294866
---
This 3-patch series refactors the Verisilicon DRM driver to move DRM-to-hardware format conversion from `atomic_commit` to `atomic_check`, improving error handling by allowing validation to occur before the point of no return.
**Series Architecture:**
The refactoring follows a logical progression:
1. Patch 1: Makes format conversion function return error codes
2. Patch 2: Introduces plane state subclassing infrastructure
3. Patch 3: Moves format conversion to atomic_check and stores result in plane state
**Overall Assessment:**
- **Conceptually sound**: Moving validation to atomic_check is the correct DRM atomic design pattern
- **Good incremental approach**: Breaking changes into logical steps aids review and bisectability
- **Implementation concerns**: Several issues with state management and error handling (detailed below)
**Key Issues:**
1. Missing null pointer checks in patch 3 (fb can be NULL in atomic_check)
2. Patch 2's state management has a use-after-free pattern
3. Incomplete header includes across the series
4. Need verification that format values are properly preserved across state duplications
---
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 14:12 [PATCH drm-misc-next 0/3] drm: verisilicon: convert drm_format to vs_format in atomic_check Icenowy Zheng
2026-02-10 14:12 ` [PATCH drm-misc-next 1/3] drm: verisilicon: make vs_format conversion function return int Icenowy Zheng
2026-02-11 6:24 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-10 14:12 ` [PATCH drm-misc-next 2/3] drm: verisilicon: subclass drm_plane_state Icenowy Zheng
2026-02-11 6:24 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-10 14:13 ` [PATCH drm-misc-next 3/3] drm: verisilicon: fill plane's vs_format in atomic_check Icenowy Zheng
2026-02-11 6:24 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-11 6:24 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-overall-20260210141300.749013-1-zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox