From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/buddy: Documentation and internal helper cleanup
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 16:07:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-overall-20260211053123.260037-4-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260211053123.260037-4-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
Overall Series Review
Subject: drm/buddy: Documentation and internal helper cleanup
Author: Sanjay Yadav <sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com>
Patches: 3
Reviewed: 2026-02-11T16:07:51.694362
---
This v2 patch series improves the GPU buddy allocator by adding comprehensive kernel-doc documentation and cleaning up the internal API surface. The series addresses feedback from v1, including correcting documentation for tree index values and adapting to the recent code relocation to `drivers/gpu/`.
**Series Structure:** The two-patch split is logical - documentation additions first, followed by code cleanup. This ordering makes sense as it documents the API before narrowing it.
**Scope:** The series claims "No functional changes" which appears accurate. The changes are purely documentation and code organization improvements.
**Version Changes:** The v2 changelog indicates:
- Rebase after DRM buddy allocator moved to `drivers/gpu/`
- Retained `gpu_buddy_block_is_free()` in header (now used by `drm_buddy.c`)
- Fixed tree index documentation (responding to Arun's feedback)
**Review Status:** Patch 2/2 already has `Reviewed-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam`.
**Concerns:**
1. The series references `drm_buddy.c` using `gpu_buddy_block_is_free()`, but this file isn't shown in the diff context. Need to verify this external dependency.
2. The header bit layout documentation in Patch 1 should be verified against actual usage.
---
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 5:31 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/buddy: Documentation and internal helper cleanup Sanjay Yadav
2026-02-11 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/buddy: Add kernel-doc for allocator structures and flags Sanjay Yadav
2026-02-11 6:07 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-12 7:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-02-12 7:40 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-02-12 9:23 ` Yadav, Sanjay Kumar
2026-02-11 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/buddy: Move internal helpers to buddy.c Sanjay Yadav
2026-02-11 6:07 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-11 6:07 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-overall-20260211053123.260037-4-sanjay.kumar.yadav@intel.com \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox