Claude review: drm/msm/dsi: add the missing parameter description

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Overall Series Review

Subject: drm/msm/dsi: add the missing parameter description
Author: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
Patches: 1
Reviewed: 2026-03-10T12:27:21.024699

---

This is a single trivial documentation patch that adds a missing `@is_bonded_dsi` kernel-doc parameter description to the `dsi_adjust_pclk_for_compression()` function. The patch was prompted by a kernel test robot (kbuild bot) warning.

**However, the patch appears to be incorrect.** Looking at the actual function signature after the patch is applied (line 588-589 of `dsi_host.c`):

```c
static unsigned long dsi_adjust_pclk_for_compression(const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
		const struct drm_dsc_config *dsc)
```

The function only takes two parameters: `mode` and `dsc`. There is **no** `is_bonded_dsi` parameter on this function. The `is_bonded_dsi` parameter exists on the *caller* function `dsi_host_get_pclk_rate()` (used at line 615), not on `dsi_adjust_pclk_for_compression()`.

Adding a `@is_bonded_dsi` doc entry to the kernel-doc for `dsi_adjust_pclk_for_compression()` will **not** fix the warning — it will create a *new* warning about a documented parameter that doesn't exist in the function signature, while doing nothing about whatever the original kbuild warning actually was.

The referenced Fixes commit `e4eb11b34d6c ("drm/msm/dsi: fix pclk rate calculation for bonded dsi")` likely added `is_bonded_dsi` to `dsi_host_get_pclk_rate()` or similar, and the kbuild warning is probably about that function's kernel-doc, not `dsi_adjust_pclk_for_compression()`.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer