public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Improve dual-link LVDS support
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:32:11 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-overall-20260312043743.261475-1-tessolveupstream@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260312043743.261475-1-tessolveupstream@gmail.com>

Overall Series Review

Subject: drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Improve dual-link LVDS support
Author: Sudarshan Shetty <tessolveupstream@gmail.com>
Patches: 8
Reviewed: 2026-03-13T14:32:11.443355

---

This series attempts to improve dual-link LVDS support for the TI SN65DSI84 bridge driver by adding a new DT property `ti,dual-link-video-mode` and hardcoding a set of register values when that property is present. The approach has **fundamental design problems**: rather than computing the correct register values from the display mode timing (divided by 2 for dual-link), the patch overwrites previously-programmed registers with magic hardcoded constants from the "TI DSI-Tuner tool." This makes the configuration panel-specific and non-generic, defeating the purpose of a general-purpose driver. The existing driver already detects dual-link via the `lvds_dual_link` flag from the OF graph ports — the cover letter's stated goal of "dividing horizontal timings by 2" would be better achieved by adjusting the existing timing calculations based on `ctx->lvds_dual_link`, not by adding a new boolean property that overwrites everything with fixed values.

---

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-13  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-12  4:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Improve dual-link LVDS support Sudarshan Shetty
2026-03-12  4:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: ti, sn65dsi83: Add dual-link video mode property Sudarshan Shetty
2026-03-12 15:46   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-03-13  4:32   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-12  4:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add support for dual-link LVDS video mode Sudarshan Shetty
2026-03-12 15:47   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-03-13  4:32   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-12  5:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Improve dual-link LVDS support Marek Vasut
2026-03-12 12:35   ` tessolveupstream
2026-03-12 15:49     ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-03-13  4:32 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=review-overall-20260312043743.261475-1-tessolveupstream@gmail.com \
    --to=claude-review@example.com \
    --cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox