From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: [linux-next mismerge] drm/fbdev-emulation: restore drm_fb_helper_gem_is_fb() dummy Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 07:12:57 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260313095657.4115599-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20260313095657.4115599-1-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Overall Series Review Subject: [linux-next mismerge] drm/fbdev-emulation: restore drm_fb_helper_g= em_is_fb() dummy Author: Arnd Bergmann Patches: 1 Reviewed: 2026-03-14T07:12:57.339546 --- This is a single patch fixing a **linux-next merge conflict**, not a patch = targeting drm-next directly. The patch addresses a build failure caused by = conflicting commits from two different trees (drm and amdgpu) being merged = together in linux-next: 1. The drm tree (commit `6d438685340d`) removed empty placeholder/stub func= tions from `drm_fb_helper.h`, including the `#else` block with stubs for `!= CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION`. 2. The amdgpu tree (commit `1837c76b780a`) added a new function `drm_fb_hel= per_gem_is_fb()` and callers in `amdgpu_display.c` and `radeon_device.c`. 3. The merge (`9c63d743d5cc`) didn't properly resolve the interaction =E2= =80=94 the new function's declaration exists in the `#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_FBDE= V_EMULATION` block, but the corresponding `#else` stub was not added, so bu= ilds with `CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=3Dn` fail. The fix is correct and straightforward. This is a standard linux-next fixup= patch. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer