* [PATCH] drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker()
@ 2026-03-21 10:57 Kexin Sun
2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude Code Review Bot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kexin Sun @ 2026-03-21 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: harry.wentland, sunpeng.li, siqueira, alexander.deucher,
christian.koenig, airlied, simona, mario.limonciello, alex.hung,
aurabindo.pillai, ray.wu, Wayne.Lin, timur.kristof, superm1,
ivan.lipski, dominik.kaszewski, amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Cc: julia.lawall, xutong.ma, kexinsun, yunbolyu, ratnadiraw
The function vblank_control_worker() was renamed
to amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker() by commit
6ce4f9ee25ff ("drm/amd/display: Add prefix to amdgpu crtc
functions"). Update the two stale references in
amdgpu_dm.c.
Assisted-by: unnamed:deepseek-v3.2 coccinelle
Signed-off-by: Kexin Sun <kexinsun@smail.nju.edu.cn>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
index b3d6f2cd8ab6..c2b7b31b0d29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
@@ -9894,7 +9894,8 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_enable_self_refresh(struct amdgpu_crtc *acrtc_attach,
* a vblank event disable request to enable PSR/RP. PSR SU/RP
* can be enabled immediately once OS demonstrates an
* adequate number of fast atomic commits to notify KMD
- * of update events. See `vblank_control_worker()`.
+ * of update events.
+ * See `amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker()`.
*/
if (!vrr_active &&
acrtc_attach->dm_irq_params.allow_sr_entry &&
@@ -10062,8 +10063,9 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
/*
* If the dirty regions changed, PSR-SU need to be disabled temporarily
* and enabled it again after dirty regions are stable to avoid video glitch.
- * PSR-SU will be enabled in vblank_control_worker() if user pause the video
- * during the PSR-SU was disabled.
+ * PSR-SU will be enabled in
+ * amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker() if user
+ * pause the video during the PSR-SU was disabled.
*/
if (acrtc_state->stream->link->psr_settings.psr_version >= DC_PSR_VERSION_SU_1 &&
acrtc_attach->dm_irq_params.allow_sr_entry &&
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Claude review: drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker()
2026-03-21 10:57 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker() Kexin Sun
@ 2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude Code Review Bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Claude Code Review Bot @ 2026-03-21 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel-reviews
Patch Review
**Correctness**: The patch is correct. The function `amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker()` is defined at `amdgpu_dm_crtc.c:246`, confirming the rename happened and the new name in the comments is accurate.
**Minor nits**:
1. The `Assisted-by: unnamed:deepseek-v3.2 coccinelle` tag is non-standard. Typically for tool-assisted changes, the tag format would be something like `Reported-by:` or just mentioned in the commit message body. The kernel community has discussed `Assisted-by:` but it is not yet a widely recognized trailer. The maintainer may ask for this to be adjusted.
2. The line wrapping in the second hunk is slightly awkward:
```
+ * PSR-SU will be enabled in
+ * amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker() if user
+ * pause the video during the PSR-SU was disabled.
```
This could read more naturally as a single reflow, but given the 80-column constraint and the long function name, it's acceptable.
3. Pre-existing grammar issue (not introduced by this patch): "if user pause the video during the PSR-SU was disabled" reads awkwardly — it should be "if the user pauses the video while PSR-SU is disabled." Since the patch is touching these lines anyway, it would be a nice cleanup to fix the grammar, but this is optional.
**Verdict**: The patch is straightforward and correct. Acceptable as-is, with optional grammar cleanup.
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Claude review: drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker()
2026-03-21 10:57 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker() Kexin Sun
2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
@ 2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude Code Review Bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Claude Code Review Bot @ 2026-03-21 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel-reviews
Overall Series Review
Subject: drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker()
Author: Kexin Sun <kexinsun@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Patches: 1
Reviewed: 2026-03-22T03:07:22.157312
---
This is a single-patch series that updates two stale comment references to `vblank_control_worker()` in `amdgpu_dm.c`, replacing them with the current function name `amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker()` after it was renamed in commit 6ce4f9ee25ff.
The change is trivial, correct, and improves code maintainability by keeping comments in sync with actual function names. No functional changes.
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-21 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-21 10:57 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker() Kexin Sun
2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-21 17:07 ` Claude Code Review Bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox