From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/doc: Remove obsolete RFC docs related to i915. Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:10:53 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260420083318.92038-6-dev@lankhorst.se> References: <20260420083318.92038-6-dev@lankhorst.se> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Overall Series Review Subject: drm/doc: Remove obsolete RFC docs related to i915. Author: Maarten Lankhorst Patches: 6 Reviewed: 2026-04-23T10:10:53.144524 --- This is a straightforward documentation cleanup series that removes four ob= solete RFC documents from `Documentation/gpu/rfc/`. The justification is so= und: these RFCs describe i915 features that have either been implemented an= d shipped (lmem, small_bar, GuC scheduler) or superseded by the xe driver (= vm_bind). The RFC section is explicitly meant to be temporary =E2=80=94 `in= dex.rst` itself says "Once the code has landed move all the documentation t= o the right places in the main core, helper or driver sections." The series is low risk (documentation-only, no code changes) and logically = structured with one patch per RFC removal. Each commit message provides ade= quate justification referencing either specific landed commits or the xe dr= iver as the successor implementation. **Minor nit on the series**: After all four patches are applied, the final = `index.rst` has two remaining `.. toctree::` directives (for `gpusvm.rst` a= nd `color_pipeline.rst`) that could be consolidated into one, but that's a = pre-existing style issue and not in scope here. No objections to this series. --- --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer