From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/panel: tdo-tl070wsh30: Use devm_drm_panel_add() Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 10:22:00 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260430141746.4214-1-pakmyeonghun@bagmyeonghun-ui-MacBookPro.local> References: <20260430141746.4214-1-pakmyeonghun@bagmyeonghun-ui-MacBookPro.local> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Overall Series Review Subject: drm/panel: tdo-tl070wsh30: Use devm_drm_panel_add() Author: "=3D?UTF-8?q?=3DEB=3DB0=3D95=3DEB=3DAA=3D85=3DED=3D9B=3D88?=3D" Patches: 1 Reviewed: 2026-05-05T10:22:00.617103 --- **NAK =E2=80=94 this patch will not compile.** The patch replaces `drm_pane= l_add()` with `devm_drm_panel_add()`, but `devm_drm_panel_add()` does not e= xist in the kernel. There is no declaration in `include/drm/drm_panel.h` an= d no definition in `drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c`. The only devm panel funct= ions that exist are `__devm_drm_panel_alloc()` and `devm_drm_panel_add_foll= ower()`, neither of which is a managed wrapper around `drm_panel_add()`. The stated goal =E2=80=94 making panel registration managed so it's automat= ically unwound on probe failure =E2=80=94 is a valid improvement. However, = the approach is incorrect because the required API does not exist. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer