From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/vmwgfx: Don't use UTS_RELEASE directly Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 08:34:38 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260504073422.1130008-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> References: <20260504073422.1130008-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Overall Series Review Subject: drm/vmwgfx: Don't use UTS_RELEASE directly Author: =?UTF-8?q?Uwe=20Kleine-K=C3=B6nig=20=28The=20Capable=20Hub=29?= Patches: 1 Reviewed: 2026-05-05T08:34:38.174808 --- This is a single, well-motivated patch that replaces direct use of the `UTS_RELEASE` compile-time macro with the runtime-equivalent `init_utsname()->release` in the vmwgfx driver. The practical benefit is improved build reproducibility: changes to `UTS_RELEASE` (which fluctuates with any uncommitted changes or new commits) no longer force recompilation of `vmwgfx_drv.o`. The runtime value is identical, so there is no behavioral change. The approach is sound, follows existing kernel conventions (i915 and xe already use `init_utsname()->release`), and the patch is clean and minimal. **No issues found.** --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer