Claude review: drm/gpusvm: Fix drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked() kernel-doc

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

Documentation-only fix, no issues with correctness.

> - * drm_gpusvm_range_pages_valid_unlocked() - GPU SVM range pages valid unlocked
> + * drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked() - GPU SVM pages valid unlocked

Correctly matches the actual function name.

> - * @range: Pointer to the GPU SVM range structure
> + * @svm_pages: Pointer to the GPU SVM pages structure

Correctly matches the actual parameter name and type (`struct drm_gpusvm_pages *svm_pages`).

> + * This function determines if a GPU SVM pages are valid. Expected be called

Minor: the grammar "if a GPU SVM pages are valid" reads awkwardly — "if GPU SVM pages are valid" (dropping the article "a") would be more natural. Similarly, "Expected be called" is missing "to" — should be "Expected to be called." These were pre-existing issues in the old text ("if a GPU SVM range pages are valid") so this patch isn't making things worse, but since the lines are being touched anyway it would be a good opportunity to clean up the grammar.

Otherwise, the patch is correct and does what the commit message says.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer