From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/gpusvm: correct kernel-doc for drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked() Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 06:21:10 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260219215510.466906-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> References: <20260219215510.466906-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> <20260219215510.466906-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review > - * drm_gpusvm_range_pages_valid_unlocked() - GPU SVM range pages valid unlocked > + * drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked() - GPU SVM range pages valid unlocked Correct. The actual function prototype is `drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked()`, so the doc comment now matches. > - * @range: Pointer to the GPU SVM range structure > + * @svm_pages: Pointer to the GPU SVM pages structure Correct. The function's second parameter is `struct drm_gpusvm_pages *svm_pages`, so the parameter doc now matches. The `@gpusvm` parameter was already correct and is left unchanged. No issues found. Straightforward kernel-doc fix that resolves the two warnings listed in the commit message. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer