Claude review: accel: Arm Ethos-U NPU: fix all uapi kernel-doc warnings

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

**Correctness: All changes verified against the actual struct definitions.**

1. **Struct name fixes** — Both are clearly correct:
   - `struct drm_ethosu_gpu_info` → `struct drm_ethosu_npu_info` (matches actual struct at line 67)
   - `struct drm_ethosu_wait_bo` → `struct drm_ethosu_bo_wait` (matches actual struct at line 170)

2. **Member name fix** — Correct:
   - `@gpu_rev: GPU revision.` → `@config: NPU revision.` — the field is indeed named `config`, not `gpu_rev`

3. **Added missing member docs** — All correct and follow existing style:
   - `@sram_size` in `drm_ethosu_npu_info`
   - `@handle`, `@pad`, `@timeout_ns` in `drm_ethosu_bo_wait`

4. **Added `@member:` prefixes** to existing comments — Correct for:
   - `@cmd_bo`, `@sram_size`, `@region_bo_handles` in `drm_ethosu_job`
   - `@jobs`, `@job_count`, `@pad` in `drm_ethosu_submit`

**Minor nit (not worth a respin):** The added `@sram_size` doc at line 81:
```c
/** @sram_size: NPU SRAM size (KB) */
```
is missing a trailing period, while the adjacent `@config` line has one:
```c
/** @config: NPU revision. */
```
This is cosmetic and inconsistency exists elsewhere in the file, so not worth blocking on.

**One question to consider:** The description `@config: NPU revision.` — "NPU revision" was carried over from the original `@gpu_rev: GPU revision.` description. Whether "revision" is the most accurate description for a field named `config` is debatable, but it's what was already there (modulo the GPU→NPU correction), and the original author of the struct presumably had a reason. This is fine as-is.

**Reviewed-by worthy.** No issues found.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer