From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Himax HX83121A
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 07:28:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch1-20260303115730.9580-2-mitltlatltl@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260303115730.9580-2-mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
Patch Review
The binding looks mostly well-structured but has several issues:
**Missing `allOf` reference to `panel-common.yaml`:**
The binding uses `backlight: true` and `unevaluatedProperties: false`, which implies it should reference the common panel schema. Other himax panel bindings (e.g., `himax,hx83102.yaml`) include:
```yaml
allOf:
- $ref: panel-common.yaml#
```
Without this, the `ports` property used in the example would fail validation against `unevaluatedProperties: false`, since `ports` is not defined in this schema — it comes from `panel-common.yaml`.
**Missing `port` / `ports` property:**
The example uses a `ports` node with two ports (for dual-DSI), but the schema doesn't declare a `ports` property. This should be added, or inherited via `panel-common.yaml`.
**Missing space in example:**
```yaml
+ port@1{
```
Should be `port@1 {` (space before brace) per DT style convention.
**`avdd-supply` and `avee-supply` naming:**
The binding defines:
```yaml
+ avdd-supply:
+ description: analog positive supply for IC
+
+ avee-supply:
+ description: analog negative supply for IC
```
But the driver code uses `vsp` and `vsn` as supply names:
```c
static const struct regulator_bulk_data himax_supplies[] = {
{ .supply = "vddi" },
{ .supply = "vsp" },
{ .supply = "vsn" },
};
```
The regulator framework maps the code's supply name + `-supply` suffix to the DT property. So the driver would look for `vsp-supply` and `vsn-supply` in DT, **not** `avdd-supply` and `avee-supply`. These must be consistent. Either rename the binding properties to `vsp-supply`/`vsn-supply` or change the driver code to use `avdd`/`avee`.
**`avdd-supply` and `avee-supply` should probably be required:**
If the panel needs these supplies to function, they should be listed in `required:`. Currently only `vddi-supply` and `reset-gpios` are required.
---
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 11:57 [PATCH 0/2] drm/panel: Add Himax HX83121A panel driver Pengyu Luo
2026-03-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Himax HX83121A Pengyu Luo
2026-03-03 13:25 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-03-03 21:28 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-03-03 11:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/panel: Add Himax HX83121A panel driver Pengyu Luo
2026-03-03 21:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-03 21:28 ` Claude Code Review Bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-15 14:45 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Pengyu Luo
2026-03-15 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Himax HX83121A Pengyu Luo
2026-03-16 1:51 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-patch1-20260303115730.9580-2-mitltlatltl@gmail.com \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox