From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: use gpiod_set_value_cansleep() Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 07:04:08 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260303152124.187791-1-jkeeping@inmusicbrands.com> References: <20260303152124.187791-1-jkeeping@inmusicbrands.com> <20260303152124.187791-1-jkeeping@inmusicbrands.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Correctness: Good.** All 7 replacements are in functions that are clearly= in process/sleepable context: - `ili9882t_unprepare()` =E2=80=94 called from DRM panel unblanking path in= process context; surrounding code calls `usleep_range()` and `regulator_di= sable()`. - `ili9882t_prepare()` =E2=80=94 same; surrounding code calls `usleep_range= ()`, `msleep()`, `regulator_enable()`, and `mipi_dsi_dcs_nop()`. - `ili9882t_add()` =E2=80=94 called from `probe` path, which is always proc= ess context. **Commit message:** Clear and accurate. The rationale ("to allow use of thi= s driver with GPIO controllers that might sleep") is the standard justifica= tion for this class of change. **Completeness:** The patch covers every `gpiod_set_value()` call in the fi= le =E2=80=94 no instances are missed. **Reviewed-by worthy:** Yes. This is a routine, low-risk correctness improv= ement with no functional change for GPIO controllers that don't sleep, and = enables the driver to work correctly with those that do. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer