From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: MAINTAINERS: adjust file entry in GPU BUDDY ALLOCATOR Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:19:01 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260311043314.265627-1-lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> References: <20260311043314.265627-1-lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> <20260311043314.265627-1-lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Commit message:** Clear and well-written. It correctly identifies the two= commits that introduced the problem and explains both changes (path fix + = alphabetical ordering). **Code changes:** The fix replaces the non-existent path with the correct one: ``` -F: drivers/gpu/drm_buddy.c +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c ``` I verified against the kernel tree: - `drivers/gpu/drm_buddy.c` =E2=80=94 **does not exist** (confirmed) - `drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c` =E2=80=94 **exists** (confirmed) - `drivers/gpu/buddy.c` =E2=80=94 **exists** (confirmed) - `drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c` =E2=80=94 **exists** (confirmed) - `include/drm/drm_buddy.h` =E2=80=94 **exists** (confirmed) - `include/linux/gpu_buddy.h` =E2=80=94 **exists** (confirmed) All file entries after the patch reference files that exist in the tree. The alphabetical reordering is also correct: ``` F: drivers/gpu/buddy.c +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c F: drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c +F: include/drm/drm_buddy.h F: include/linux/gpu_buddy.h ``` This follows `b` < `d` < `t` for `drivers/gpu/` entries and `d` < `l` for `= include/` entries. **No issues found.** Reviewed-by worthy. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer