Claude review: drm/dp: Add quirk to disable Panel Replay on certain panels

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

**Quirk scope is overly broad (major concern):**

The quirk entry uses `DEVICE_ID_ANY`:
```c
{ OUI(0x00, 0x22, 0xb9), DEVICE_ID_ANY, false, BIT(DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PANEL_REPLAY) },
```

OUI `0x00, 0x22, 0xb9` is the LG Display OUI. Using `DEVICE_ID_ANY` means this quirk will match **all** LG Display sink devices (non-branch, `is_branch=false`), not just the specific problematic panel model. The cover letter says "LGD panel" (singular), and the commit message says "LG panel" — this suggests a specific panel model is affected, but the quirk disables Panel Replay for every LG eDP/DP sink panel.

Compare with the existing `DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR` for Apple panels — that was also `DEVICE_ID_ANY`, but that was a broader decision about all Apple panels. Here, the commit message says "problems with LG panel" implying a specific model. If the specific device ID is known (as it was for the `LP140WF6-SPM1` entry on line 2542), it should be used to avoid unnecessarily disabling Panel Replay on other LG panels that work fine.

The comment is also vague:
```c
/* Problems observed with LG panel */
```
It would be better to include the specific panel model or reference the bug tracker issue (which is in patch 2's commit message but not here).

**Enum placement is correct:** `DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PANEL_REPLAY` is placed right after `DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR`, which is logically sensible since they are related features.

**Documentation comment has minor grammar issue:**
```c
 * The device does not support Panel Replay even if reports
 * that it supports or driver still need to implement proper
 * handling for such device.
```
"even if reports" should be "even if it reports", and "driver still need" should be "the driver still needs". This is the same wording as `DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR` though, so that's a pre-existing issue being copied.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer