Claude review: drm/amd/display: update outdated comments for renamed vblank_control_worker()

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

**Correctness**: The patch is correct. The function `amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker()` is defined at `amdgpu_dm_crtc.c:246`, confirming the rename happened and the new name in the comments is accurate.

**Minor nits**:

1. The `Assisted-by: unnamed:deepseek-v3.2 coccinelle` tag is non-standard. Typically for tool-assisted changes, the tag format would be something like `Reported-by:` or just mentioned in the commit message body. The kernel community has discussed `Assisted-by:` but it is not yet a widely recognized trailer. The maintainer may ask for this to be adjusted.

2. The line wrapping in the second hunk is slightly awkward:
   ```
   +			 * PSR-SU will be enabled in
   +			 * amdgpu_dm_crtc_vblank_control_worker() if user
   +			 * pause the video during the PSR-SU was disabled.
   ```
   This could read more naturally as a single reflow, but given the 80-column constraint and the long function name, it's acceptable.

3. Pre-existing grammar issue (not introduced by this patch): "if user pause the video during the PSR-SU was disabled" reads awkwardly — it should be "if the user pauses the video while PSR-SU is disabled." Since the patch is touching these lines anyway, it would be a nice cleanup to fix the grammar, but this is optional.

**Verdict**: The patch is straightforward and correct. Acceptable as-is, with optional grammar cleanup.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer