Claude review: Fix kernel-doc for amdgpu_display_manager

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

**Change:** Adds one line to the struct-level kernel-doc comment block (lines 321-351 of `amdgpu_dm.h`) for the `@boot_time_crc_info` member:

```
+ * @boot_time_crc_info: Stores CRC information collected during boot
```

**Assessment: Correct.**

The `boot_time_crc_info` member (line 708, `struct dm_boot_time_crc_info boot_time_crc_info`) already has an inline per-member kernel-doc comment at lines 703-707, but the top-level struct documentation comment was missing the corresponding `@boot_time_crc_info` entry — which is what triggers the `make htmldocs` warning. The added description is consistent with the inline comment ("Buffer info for the boot time crc") and the struct definition (`struct dm_boot_time_crc_info` at lines 112-124, which holds a CPU address, BO pointer, GPU address, and size for a boot-time CRC buffer).

**Nits (minor, not blocking):**

1. **Commit subject line** — The subject `Fix kernel-doc for amdgpu_display_manager` lacks the conventional subsystem prefix. Typical AMDGPU display patches use `drm/amd/display:` as a prefix, e.g.:
   ```
   drm/amd/display: Fix kernel-doc warning for amdgpu_display_manager
   ```

2. **Commit message style** — The body uses first person ("i added the description") which is unusual for kernel commit messages; the conventional kernel style uses imperative mood ("Add the missing description..."). The lowercase "i" should also be capitalized.

3. **Completeness** — The top-level struct doc comment is missing descriptions for many other members beyond `boot_time_crc_info` (the struct has ~50+ members but the top comment only documents ~18). This patch only silences *one* warning, but that's fine — fixing all missing descriptions is out of scope for this patch.

**No functional concerns** — this is a documentation-only change with zero runtime impact.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer