From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: dt-bindings: display/msm: gpu: Document Adreno X2-185 Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 09:19:36 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260501-glymur-gpu-dt-v2-1-2f128b5596bb@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260501-glymur-gpu-dt-v2-0-2f128b5596bb@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260501-glymur-gpu-dt-v2-1-2f128b5596bb@oss.qualcomm.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Status: Looks good.** This patch adds a single compatible string entry: ``` - qcom,adreno-43051401 + - qcom,adreno-44070001 ``` The compatible string `qcom,adreno-44070001` follows the established naming= convention of `qcom,adreno-XXYYYZZZ` where the hex value encodes the chip/= core/major/minor IDs. It is placed in sorted order after the existing A430 = family entries. One minor note: the commit message says "Adreno X2-185" but the cover lette= r says "Adreno X2-85". The subject line also says "X2-185". It would be goo= d to confirm which marketing name is correct =E2=80=94 the cover letter and= the commit messages disagree. If the cover letter's "X2-85" is the correct= name, the commit message subject should be updated. No other concerns. --- --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer