Claude review: drm/vmwgfx: Don't use UTS_RELEASE directly

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

**Verdict: Looks good / No issues.**

The patch makes three changes:

1. **Removes `#include <generated/utsrelease.h>`** — this header provided the `UTS_RELEASE` macro, no longer needed.

2. **Adds `#include <linux/utsname.h>`** — provides `init_utsname()`. Placed in correct alphabetical order among the `<linux/...>` includes.

3. **Replaces the macro usage:**
```c
-			VMWGFX_DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL, UTS_RELEASE);
+			VMWGFX_DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL, init_utsname()->release);
```

This is the only usage of `UTS_RELEASE` in the file, so the include swap is complete. The `init_utsname()->release` accessor returns the same NUL-terminated string at runtime, so the `%s` format specifier in `vmw_host_printf` works identically.

The pattern is already established in other DRM drivers — `drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c` and `drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c` both use `init_utsname()->release` the same way.

The commit message clearly explains the motivation (build reproducibility / avoiding unnecessary recompilation) and the cover letter honestly notes that dropping the version string entirely would be an alternative, which shows good judgment in choosing the less disruptive option.

**Reviewed-by worthy.** No correctness, style, or design concerns.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer