From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: dt-bindings: bridge: Add Lontium LT9611C(EX/UXD) MIPI DSI to HDMI driver Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 13:46:47 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260506095100.78998-2-syyang@lontium.com> References: <20260506095100.78998-1-syyang@lontium.com> <20260506095100.78998-2-syyang@lontium.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Encoding issue in description:** ```yaml - The LT9611 and LT9611UXC are bridge devices which convert DSI to HDMI + The LT9611=E3=80=81LT9611UXC=E3=80=81LT9611C=E3=80=81LT9611EX and LT9611= UXD + are bridge devices which convert DSI to HDMI ``` The fullwidth ideographic commas (`=E3=80=81`, U+3001) must be replaced wit= h standard commas (`,`). This is a DT binding document, not CJK text. **Sharing a binding with a different driver:** The three new compatible str= ings (`lontium,lt9611c`, `lontium,lt9611ex`, `lontium,lt9611uxd`) are being= added to the existing `lontium,lt9611.yaml`, but patch 2 creates an entire= ly separate driver (`lontium-lt9611c.c`) for these chips. While the hardwar= e is similar enough that the DT properties are the same, this coupling is f= ragile. If the C/EX/UXD variants ever diverge in DT requirements, it will r= equire disentangling the bindings. This is likely acceptable if the DT main= tainers have already agreed to it (the v3 changelog says merging was done p= er review), but it should be noted. **Missing example update:** Adding an example for one of the new compatible= strings (e.g., `lontium,lt9611c`) would strengthen the binding validation. --- --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer