From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Ilitek ILI9488 panel controller Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 12:40:41 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260527062300.88928-2-igor@reznichenko.net> References: <20260527062300.88928-1-igor@reznichenko.net> <20260527062300.88928-2-igor@reznichenko.net> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley** =E2=80=94 this patch already carries a DT bin= ding review tag. The binding is clean and follows the established pattern from `ilitek,ili98= 05.yaml`. The `focuslcds` vendor prefix addition is correctly placed alphab= etically. **Minor observation =E2=80=94 `backlight` as required:** ```yaml required: - compatible - reg - vci-supply - iovcc-supply - reset-gpios - backlight - port ``` Making `backlight` required means every board using this panel *must* speci= fy a backlight phandle in DT. This is consistent with the ILI9805 binding, = so it's a deliberate pattern choice and acceptable, but some DT reviewers p= refer `backlight` as optional since some deployments use fixed-on backlight= s. Since this already has Conor's Reviewed-by, this is fine as-is. No other issues with patch 1. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer