From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix inconsistent indenting in amdgpu_gfx_ring_preempt_ib Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 12:23:11 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <606b422c-4531-4950-a22e-61732383f6b5@amd.com> References: <606b422c-4531-4950-a22e-61732383f6b5@amd.com> <606b422c-4531-4950-a22e-61732383f6b5@amd.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Status: Correct, minor commit message nit** The fix itself is obviously correct. I verified against the current drm-next tree at line 2730 of `amdgpu_gfx.c`: ```c /* deassert preemption condition */ amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, true); ``` The line uses 4 spaces for indentation, while every other line in the function uses tabs. The patch replaces the spaces with a tab: ```c /* deassert preemption condition */ amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, true); ``` This aligns it with the matching call earlier in the function (line 2711): ```c /* assert preemption condition */ amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, false); ``` **Minor nit on commit message:** The commit message says "Fixes a whitespace indentation issue reported by the smatch static checker tool" but doesn't include a `Fixes:` tag pointing to the commit that introduced the bad indentation. For a pure whitespace fix this is arguably unnecessary, but if reviewers want one, it would point to the commit that introduced the space-indented line. This is not a blocker. **No functional concerns.** The patch is a trivial whitespace-only change with no behavioral impact. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer