public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: Re: [PATCH] docs/gpu: fix spelling mistakes in todo.rst
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 08:12:28 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch1-e9898533-6ec0-430f-aa56-b8f472b612a5@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9898533-6ec0-430f-aa56-b8f472b612a5@infradead.org>

Patch Review

**All three fixes are correct:**

1. `varios` → `various` (line 272 of current tree) — confirmed typo still present.
2. `implementions` → `implementations` (line 297) — confirmed typo still present.
3. `complection` → `completion` (line 885) — confirmed typo still present.

**Minor observation (pre-existing, not introduced by this patch):** In the second hunk's context, lines 298–300 of the current tree contain what appears to be a pre-existing copy-paste duplication:

```
- Set the mkwrite and fsync callbacks with similar implementations to the core
  fbdev defio stuff. These should all work on plain ptes, they don't actually
  require a struct page.  uff. These should all work on plain ptes, they don't
  actually require a struct page.
```

The sentence "These should all work on plain ptes, they don't actually require a struct page." is repeated, with a stray "uff." in between. This is not the responsibility of this patch, but the author could optionally fix it as a follow-up or fold it into this patch since they're already touching adjacent lines.

**No issues with the patch itself.**

Reviewed-by assessment: The patch is correct and ready to merge.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-08 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-06 21:56 [PATCH] docs/gpu: fix spelling mistakes in todo.rst Mikael Rothig
2026-03-06 22:18 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-03-08 22:12   ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-03-08 22:12   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=review-patch1-e9898533-6ec0-430f-aa56-b8f472b612a5@infradead.org \
    --to=claude-review@example.com \
    --cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox