From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: Re: [PATCH] docs/gpu: fix spelling mistakes in todo.rst Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 08:12:28 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **All three fixes are correct:** 1. `varios` =E2=86=92 `various` (line 272 of current tree) =E2=80=94 confir= med typo still present. 2. `implementions` =E2=86=92 `implementations` (line 297) =E2=80=94 confirm= ed typo still present. 3. `complection` =E2=86=92 `completion` (line 885) =E2=80=94 confirmed typo= still present. **Minor observation (pre-existing, not introduced by this patch):** In the = second hunk's context, lines 298=E2=80=93300 of the current tree contain wh= at appears to be a pre-existing copy-paste duplication: ``` - Set the mkwrite and fsync callbacks with similar implementations to the c= ore fbdev defio stuff. These should all work on plain ptes, they don't actual= ly require a struct page. uff. These should all work on plain ptes, they do= n't actually require a struct page. ``` The sentence "These should all work on plain ptes, they don't actually requ= ire a struct page." is repeated, with a stray "uff." in between. This is no= t the responsibility of this patch, but the author could optionally fix it = as a follow-up or fold it into this patch since they're already touching ad= jacent lines. **No issues with the patch itself.** Reviewed-by assessment: The patch is correct and ready to merge. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer