From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/panthor: Use the irqsave variant of spin_lock in panthor_gpu_irq_handler() Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 13:32:47 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260512-panthor-signal-from-irq-v2-10-95c614a739cb@collabora.com> References: <20260512-panthor-signal-from-irq-v2-0-95c614a739cb@collabora.com> <20260512-panthor-signal-from-irq-v2-10-95c614a739cb@collabora.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review Simple conversion of `spin_lock(&ptdev->gpu->reqs_lock)` / `spin_unlock(...)` to `guard(spinlock_irqsave)`. Preparation for patch 11 which moves GPU event processing to hard IRQ context. As the commit message notes, this is already consistent with other users of `reqs_lock`. No concerns. --- --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer