From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: dt-bindings: display/lvds-codec: add ti,sn65lvds93
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:58:08 +1000
Message-ID: <review-patch13-20260302190953.669325-14-hugo@hugovil.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260302190953.669325-14-hugo@hugovil.com>
References: <20260302190953.669325-1-hugo@hugovil.com> <20260302190953.669325-14-hugo@hugovil.com>
X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Patch Review

**Issue**: The commit message says "SN65LVDS93" but the code uses `ti,sn75l=
vds93`. Looking at TI's product line, the SN**75**LVDS83/93 are the FlatLin=
k transmitters (encoders), while the SN**65**LVDS series are receivers. Sin=
ce this is in the encoder section of the binding, `sn75lvds93` in the code =
is correct, but the commit message and subject should say "sn75lvds93" not =
"sn65lvds93":

```
Subject: dt-bindings: display/lvds-codec: add ti,sn75lvds93
                                              ^^
```

Also, the commit description says "Similar to SN65LVDS83" =E2=80=94 should =
be "SN75LVDS83".

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer