From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/panel-simple: Fix powertip,ph800480t013-idf02 timings Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 12:04:24 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260513-tc358762-fixes-v3-13-6698b55008b9@ideasonboard.com> References: <20260513-tc358762-fixes-v3-0-6698b55008b9@ideasonboard.com> <20260513-tc358762-fixes-v3-13-6698b55008b9@ideasonboard.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review Fixes the panel timings to match the datasheet: - **hsw**: 2=E2=86=9220 (middle of datasheet range), hbp: 44=E2=86=9226 (hs= w+hbp=3D46 preserved =E2=9C=93) - **vsw+vbp**: was 2+22=3D24, now 2+21=3D23 (matches datasheet =E2=9C=93) - **Clock**: 24750=E2=86=9233333 kHz (old gave ~49.7fps, new gives ~60fps = =E2=9C=93) - **hfp**: 54=E2=86=92210, **vfp**: 49=E2=86=9223 (using datasheet typical = values) I verified: new htotal=3D1056, vtotal=3D526, fps=3D33333000/(1056=C3=97526)= =E2=89=8860.0. The math checks out. The commit message is thorough in explaining the reasoning for each change.= The `vfp=3D23` instead of datasheet's 22 for closer 60fps match is a reaso= nable practical choice, well-documented. No issues. **Reviewed-by worthy.** --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer