Claude review: drm/imagination: Skip 2nd thread DM association for non META Firmware

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

**Logic:**

Correct. Only META firmware processors have two threads, so the Thread1 DM association writes should be skipped for RISC-V (and any other non-META) firmware. The `meta_fw` variable was already introduced in patch 1, so this uses it cleanly.

**Indentation issue:**

```c
	if (meta_fw) {
		pvr_cr_write32(pvr_dev, ROGUE_CR_MTS_INTCTX_THREAD1_DM_ASSOC,
			   ROGUE_CR_MTS_INTCTX_THREAD1_DM_ASSOC_MASKFULL &
			   ROGUE_CR_MTS_INTCTX_THREAD1_DM_ASSOC_DM_ASSOC_CLRMSK);
		pvr_cr_write32(pvr_dev, ROGUE_CR_MTS_BGCTX_THREAD1_DM_ASSOC,
			   ROGUE_CR_MTS_BGCTX_THREAD1_DM_ASSOC_MASKFULL &
			   ROGUE_CR_MTS_BGCTX_THREAD1_DM_ASSOC_DM_ASSOC_CLRMSK);
	}
```

The continuation lines for the `pvr_cr_write32` arguments are indented with spaces to align to column position, but they don't match the surrounding code's alignment style. Before this patch, these same lines used tab+spaces to align the arguments under the opening parenthesis. After the patch, the arguments are indented less (3 tabs + 3 spaces) instead of matching the opening paren position. Compare with the Thread0 writes just above which use proper alignment. This should be fixed for consistency.

**Overall:** Both patches are straightforward and correct in intent. The main actionable items are:
1. Explain (in commit message or comment) why the early SLC idle check was added for non-MARS configs in patch 1.
2. Fix the alignment/indentation issues in both patches.
3. Fix the missing period in the multi-line comment and the stray blank line in patch 1.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer