From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/xe: Set TTM device beneficial_order to 9 (2M)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:01:58 +1000
Message-ID: <review-patch2-20260421012608.1474950-3-matthew.brost@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260421012608.1474950-3-matthew.brost@intel.com>
References: <20260421012608.1474950-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> <20260421012608.1474950-3-matthew.brost@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0

Patch Review

```c
-			      xe->drm.vma_offset_manager, 0);
+			      xe->drm.vma_offset_manager,
+			      TTM_ALLOCATION_POOL_BENEFICIAL_ORDER(get_order(SZ_2M)));
```

Straightforward and correct. `get_order(SZ_2M)` returns 9 (2MB / 4KB = 512 = 2^9). The macro `TTM_ALLOCATION_POOL_BENEFICIAL_ORDER` masks to the lower 8 bits, which is fine for value 9.

This correctly enables the Patch 1 behavior for Xe. The 2MB sweet spot matches the large GPU page size, which makes sense for Xe's memory management.

No concerns with this patch.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer