From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add support for RK3576 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:27:11 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260310105307.309765-4-damon.ding@rock-chips.com> References: <20260310105307.309765-1-damon.ding@rock-chips.com> <20260310105307.309765-4-damon.ding@rock-chips.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review The patch adds `RK3576_EDP` to the `analogix_dp_devtype` enum and makes it = fall through to the `RK3588_EDP` case: ```c + case RK3576_EDP: case RK3588_EDP: video_info->max_link_rate =3D 0x14; video_info->max_lane_count =3D 0x04; ``` This is clean =E2=80=94 the cover letter states the eDP TX controller IP is= the same as RK3588, so sharing the same max_link_rate (0x14 =3D HBR2, 5.4 = Gbps) and max_lane_count (4) is correct. The `is_rockchip()` update is also correct: ```c - return type =3D=3D RK3288_DP || type =3D=3D RK3399_EDP || type =3D=3D RK3= 588_EDP; + return type =3D=3D RK3288_DP || type =3D=3D RK3399_EDP || type =3D=3D RK3= 576_EDP || type =3D=3D RK3588_EDP; ``` **Minor nit:** This function keeps growing with each new SoC. It might be c= leaner to use a range check or a default-true approach, but that's a pre-ex= isting issue, not something to block this patch. No blocking issues. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer