From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/doc/rfc: Remove i915_small_bar rfc. Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:10:53 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260420083318.92038-9-dev@lankhorst.se> References: <20260420083318.92038-6-dev@lankhorst.se> <20260420083318.92038-9-dev@lankhorst.se> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Reviewed-by worthy**: Yes. The commit message references the specific commits that implemented the sma= ll BAR feature: - `525e93f6317a ("drm/i915/uapi: add NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS hint")` - `3f4309cbdc84 ("drm/i915/uapi: add probed_cpu_visible_size")` The RFC described the `I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS` flag and = `probed_cpu_visible_size` attribute, both of which are now in the actual UA= PI headers. The RFC has served its purpose. The cautious "Probably done" in the commit message is honest =E2=80=94 but = looking at the RFC content, both key features it describes (the `NEEDS_CPU_= ACCESS` flag and `probed_cpu_visible_size`) are referenced by the cited com= mits. This is done. No issues. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer