public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/atomic: Allocate atomic_state at the beginning of atomic_ioctl
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:27:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch4-20260223-atomic-v10-4-f59c8def2e70@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223-atomic-v10-4-f59c8def2e70@intel.com>

Patch Review

> +	state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev);
> +	if (!state)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx, DRM_MODESET_ACQUIRE_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	state->acquire_ctx = &ctx;
> +	state->allow_modeset = !!(arg->flags & DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET);
> +
>  	/* disallow for userspace that has not enabled atomic cap (even

Moving the allocation earlier means every ioctl call that fails early validation (bad flags, atomic cap not enabled, etc.) now incurs the overhead of allocating and freeing an atomic state and initializing/finalizing the acquire context. Previously these were cheap early returns. This is a performance regression on common error paths, though probably not significant in practice.

The `goto out` cleanup path calls `drm_atomic_state_put(state)` and `drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx)` / `drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx)`. I verified that these are safe to call even when no locks were acquired. This is correct.

No correctness bugs found here.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23  9:15 [PATCH v10 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23  9:15 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] drm: Define user readable error codes for atomic ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-24  0:26   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-23  9:16 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] drm/atomic: Add error_code element in atomic_state Arun R Murthy
2026-02-24  0:26   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-23  9:16 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] drm/atomic: Call complete_signaling only if prepare_signaling is done Arun R Murthy
2026-02-24  0:26   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-23  9:16 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] drm/atomic: Allocate atomic_state at the beginning of atomic_ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-24  0:27   ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-02-23  9:16 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] drm/atomic: Return user readable error in atomic_ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-24  0:27   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-23  9:16 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] drm/i915/display: Error codes for async flip failures Arun R Murthy
2026-02-24  0:27   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-23  9:16 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] drm: Introduce DRM_CAP_ATOMIC_ERROR_REPORTING Arun R Murthy
2026-02-24  0:27   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure Murthy, Arun R
2026-02-24  0:26 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-10  9:03 [PATCH v9 0/7] " Arun R Murthy
2026-02-10  9:03 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] drm/atomic: Allocate atomic_state at the beginning of atomic_ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11  6:31   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=review-patch4-20260223-atomic-v10-4-f59c8def2e70@intel.com \
    --to=claude-review@example.com \
    --cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox