From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: accel/habanalabs: Use trace_call__##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:48:30 +1000
Message-ID: <review-patch5-20260323160052.17528-6-vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
In-Reply-To: <20260323160052.17528-6-vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
References: <20260323160052.17528-1-vineeth@bitbyteword.org> <20260323160052.17528-6-vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0

Patch Review

All conversions are correct. Each `trace_call__` replacement is properly guarded by the corresponding `trace_*_enabled()` check. Examples:

```c
if (trace_habanalabs_dma_alloc_enabled() && !ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(ptr))
    trace_call__habanalabs_dma_alloc(...)
```

```c
if (unlikely(trace_habanalabs_rreg32_enabled()))
    trace_call__habanalabs_rreg32(...)
```

The alignment fixups in `device.c` (e.g. adjusting continuation-line indentation for the longer function name) look fine.

No issues.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer