From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779g0: Add DSC Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 09:29:58 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260515-rcar-du-dsc-v3-5-164157820498@ideasonboard.com> References: <20260515-rcar-du-dsc-v3-0-164157820498@ideasonboard.com> <20260515-rcar-du-dsc-v3-5-164157820498@ideasonboard.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review Correctly inserts the DSC node between DU and DSI1 in the SoC dtsi, rewirin= g: - `du_out_dsi1` =E2=86=92 `dsc_in_dsi1` (was `dsi1_in`) - `dsc_out_dsi1` =E2=86=92 `dsi1_in` - `dsi1_in` =E2=86=90 `dsc_out_dsi1` (was `du_out_dsi1`) The DSC node is `status =3D "disabled"` by default, which is correct =E2=80= =94 boards that need it enable it explicitly (patches 6 and 7). Note that this patch changes the `du_out_dsi1` remote-endpoint, which means= the DSI1 pipeline is broken on any board that doesn't also enable the DSC.= Since DSI1 was previously connected directly to `dsi1_in`, any board using= DSI1 without the DSC driver loaded would fail. However, looking at the exi= sting tree, DSI1 usage already requires explicit board-level enablement, an= d the DSC is `disabled` by default, so the DT graph won't resolve unless DS= C is also enabled. This should be fine =E2=80=94 but it's worth noting that= this is a potential bisection hazard if patches 5, 6, and 7 don't land tog= ether. The commit message could mention this dependency. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer