From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-verdin: Add Toradex Capacitive Touch Display 10.1" DSI Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 18:25:01 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260522161105.277519-18-ivitro@gmail.com> References: <20260522161105.277519-13-ivitro@gmail.com> <20260522161105.277519-18-ivitro@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review This is a DSI display overlay using an SN65DSI83 bridge (note: SN65DSI**83*= *, single-channel LVDS, vs the SN65DSI**84** dual-channel in patch 1). The = panel is a Riverdi RVT101HVLNWC00. - The panel node uses `compatible =3D "riverdi,rvt101hvlnwc00", "panel-lvds= "` with full `panel-timing` block. This is the correct pattern for `panel-l= vds` compatible bindings =E2=80=94 a vendor-specific first compatible strin= g with `panel-lvds` as fallback, accompanied by explicit timing. - Panel timing looks reasonable for a 1280x800@60Hz panel: `clock-frequency= =3D <72400000>` (~72.4 MHz) with the specified blanking intervals yields a= pproximately 60 Hz. - The touchscreen uses `ilitek,ili2132` at address `0x41` with `IRQ_TYPE_ED= GE_RISING` =E2=80=94 this differs from patch 1's Atmel MaxTouch at `0x4a` w= ith `IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING`. The different touch controllers and interrupt = polarities match the different display products. Correct. - This overlay and patch 6 (7" DSI) would conflict if both were applied sim= ultaneously (same label names `backlight_pwm3`, `dsi_bridge_out`, `dsi_lvds= _bridge_in`, `dsi_lvds_bridge_out`, `panel_lvds_bridge_in`). This is expect= ed and fine =E2=80=94 they're mutually exclusive overlays for the same DSI = port. - Composite DTB entries are added for both WiFi and non-WiFi Dahlia variant= s. Good. **No blocking issues.** --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer