From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: drm/amdgpu: update for u64 i_ino Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 11:50:54 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260226-iino-u64-v1-52-ccceff366db9@kernel.org> References: <20260226-iino-u64-v1-0-ccceff366db9@kernel.org> <20260226-iino-u64-v1-52-ccceff366db9@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review **Status: Correct, no issues.** This patch updates two `seq_printf` format specifiers in `amdgpu_bo_print_info()` from `%lu` to `%llu` to match the new `u64` type of `i_ino`. The change: ```c - seq_printf(m, " imported from ino:%lu", file_inode(dma_buf->file)->i_ino); + seq_printf(m, " imported from ino:%llu", file_inode(dma_buf->file)->i_ino); else if (dma_buf) - seq_printf(m, " exported as ino:%lu", file_inode(dma_buf->file)->i_ino); + seq_printf(m, " exported as ino:%llu", file_inode(dma_buf->file)->i_ino); ``` Both changes are correct. The `%llu` format specifier matches `u64` (which is `unsigned long long` on all architectures). The expressions `file_inode(dma_buf->file)->i_ino` are the only uses of `i_ino` in this file, so coverage is complete. No functional, semantic, or style concerns. --- --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer