From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/i915/display: Error codes for async flip failures
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 16:31:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch6-20260210-atomic-v9-6-525c88fd2402@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260210-atomic-v9-6-525c88fd2402@intel.com>
Patch Review
**Issues:**
```c
if (intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state)) {
- drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
- "[CRTC:%d:%s] modeset required\n",
- crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name);
+ drm_mode_atomic_add_error_msg(&state->base.error_code,
+ DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_CRTC_NEED_FULL_MODESET,
+ "[CRTC:%d:%s] requires full modeset",
+ crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name);
```
- **Inconsistent Logging**: Original used `drm_dbg_kms`, now uses `drm_dbg_atomic` (inside add_error_msg). This changes which debug category the message appears in.
- **Message Change**: "modeset required" vs "requires full modeset" - why change?
```c
+ drm_mode_atomic_add_error_msg(&state->base.error_code,
+ DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_INVALID_API_USAGE,
+ "[PLANE:%d:%s] pixel format %p4cc / 0x%llx modifier does not support async flip",
```
- **Format String**: Reordering format string from `%p4cc / modifier 0x%llx` to `%p4cc / 0x%llx modifier` is unnecessary and makes it harder to review.
- **Message Truncation Risk**: This is a long message that may be truncated to 128 chars.
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 9:03 [PATCH v9 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure Arun R Murthy
2026-02-10 9:03 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] drm: Define user readable error codes for atomic ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-10 9:03 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] drm/atomic: Add error_code element in atomic_state Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-10 9:03 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] drm/atomic: Allocate atomic_state at the beginning of atomic_ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-10 9:03 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] drm/atomic: Call complete_signaling only if prepare_signaling is done Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-10 9:03 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] drm/atomic: Return user readable error in atomic_ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-10 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] drm/i915/display: Error codes for async flip failures Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-02-10 9:04 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] drm: Introduce DRM_CAP_ATOMIC_ERROR_REPORTING Arun R Murthy
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-02-11 6:31 ` Claude review: User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-patch6-20260210-atomic-v9-6-525c88fd2402@intel.com \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox