From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claude Code Review Bot To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com Subject: Claude review: soc: qcom: ubwc: Add configuration Eliza SoC Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 07:15:20 +1000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260303-drm-display-eliza-v1-6-814121dbb2bf@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260303-drm-display-eliza-v1-0-814121dbb2bf@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260303-drm-display-eliza-v1-6-814121dbb2bf@oss.qualcomm.com> X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Patch Review Adds `{ .compatible = "qcom,eliza", .data = &sm8550_data, }` to the UBWC OF match table. Using `sm8550_data` is consistent -- SM8650 also uses `sm8550_data` (both UBWC 4.0/4.3), while SM8750 uses its own `sm8750_data` (UBWC 5.0). **Nit**: The entry is placed between `qcom,kaanapali` and `qcom,glymur`. While the overall table is not strictly alphabetically sorted, `qcom,eliza` sorts before both `qcom,glymur` and `qcom,kaanapali`. If the intent was alphabetical ordering for this group of codename-based SoCs, the order should be: eliza, glymur, kaanapali. --- Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer