From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/bridge: adv7511: switch to of_drm_get_bridge_by_endpoint()
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 15:02:24 +1000
Message-ID: <review-patch8-20260511-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-panel_or_bridge-v6-8-f61c9e498b3f@bootlin.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260511-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-panel_or_bridge-v6-8-f61c9e498b3f@bootlin.com>
References: <20260511-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-panel_or_bridge-v6-0-f61c9e498b3f@bootlin.com> <20260511-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-panel_or_bridge-v6-8-f61c9e498b3f@bootlin.com>
X-Mailer: Claude Code Patch Reviewer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0

Patch Review

Same migration pattern. Also correctly handles the optional `-ENODEV` case (no downstream bridge connected):

```c
if (IS_ERR(adv7511->bridge.next_bridge)) {
    if (PTR_ERR(adv7511->bridge.next_bridge) == -ENODEV)
        adv7511->bridge.next_bridge = NULL;
    else
        return PTR_ERR(adv7511->bridge.next_bridge);
}
```

The existing `if (adv->bridge.next_bridge)` guard in `adv7511_bridge_attach()` correctly handles the NULL case. No issues.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer